Eratosphere Forums - Metrical Poetry, Free Verse, Fiction, Art, Critique, Discussions Able Muse - a review of poetry, prose and art

Forum Left Top

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 04-21-2012, 02:31 PM
Janice D. Soderling's Avatar
Janice D. Soderling Janice D. Soderling is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 14,175
Default Conceptual literature redux

For your reading pleasure.

http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harr...+The+Blog%2 9
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 04-21-2012, 04:08 PM
Nicholas F. Nicholas F. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 1,049
Default

I'd rather read tea leaves.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 04-21-2012, 04:15 PM
Jesse Anger Jesse Anger is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,181
Default

As a Canadian writer I am quite familiar with Christian, he's buddies with most of my profs, and that awful book Annoya, or whatever it's called, is everywhere. Although I think Bok is an excellent lecturer and essayist I find his poetry, sorry, retarded. I could give a shit about a damn machine that writes nonsense sentences, it's dumb. Now writers that create palindromes and do other linguistic tricks such as mirrored constructions upset a set up have a place in my heart, I've always enjoyed premutating letters and such -- but that's not poetry, it's word wizardry. He said once in a lecture that I was at that one need not ever write another sonnet because there was a computer program creating sonnets by the minute -- it sure was( maybe still is) creating 14 IP lines, but that's it -- that ain't no sonnet.

Anyway, as you may be able to tell this guy has a way of getting under my skin, and while I think him a wonderful man I find his aesthetics repulsive.

Janice, this is a good topic link for a discussion

J

Last edited by Jesse Anger; 04-21-2012 at 08:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 04-21-2012, 04:36 PM
Janice D. Soderling's Avatar
Janice D. Soderling Janice D. Soderling is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 14,175
Default

Right to both you. We have had some knockdown and dragout threads on this already. That's why I thought it might be of interest.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 04-21-2012, 04:40 PM
Chris Childers's Avatar
Chris Childers Chris Childers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Middletown, DE
Posts: 3,062
Default

I think pentametron is funny. You can only read so many of these things, but any single line could provoke a poem. It would be a good exercise.

Edit: This one almost makes sense:

4/20 ain't a fucking holiday
This female really fucking trying me
We talking swisher sweets and warren G
I love expensive jeans & crispy shoes
I want tattoos, tattoos & more tattoos.
I neva gave a fuck about a hoe!!!!
i am a really lazy person tho
jus saw a pussy wagon mini van
We even get an elevator man
I never really trusted NOBODY!
Remember love! Remember you and me! ♥
I hope chicago kicks miami's ass
I'm gonna kill Monique retarded ass
We're number one. Hello Hello Hello...

Last edited by Chris Childers; 04-21-2012 at 04:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 04-21-2012, 06:02 PM
R. Nemo Hill's Avatar
R. Nemo Hill R. Nemo Hill is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Halcott, New York
Posts: 9,870
Default

I see no harm in ego-less surrealism.
A poem is often about what a reader brings to it anyway.

And cries of horror or outrage or tsk-tsk-ing at this sort of thing are so predictable. Now that surrealism has been co-opted by advertising or by dull poets who needs to brighten up dull patches in their verse--it's salubrious to remember that it provoked the same sort of reaction: automatic writing (albeit without a machine), scandalous! What will become of literature?!

I'd certainly rather see twitter used this way than for the usual inane shallow conversation.

Nemo
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 04-21-2012, 09:14 PM
Jesse Anger Jesse Anger is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,181
Default

I agree with you Nemo on most of what you've written. Although, I feel that there is something other than blind randomness at work in the act of automatic writing, something that a machine cannot tap into, something which requires will, intelligence and consciousness, or the intersection of these.

To deny the ego is still an egocentric act, a thing in reverse, still the thing.

I am down with the surrealists, for sure, and to a lesser extent the Dadaists -- I need to study the latter further. This is different; something about the synthetic generation of poetry irks me, to me, and this may be totally romanticized, the act of writing poems is a magical act, it's more than simply throwing together random words -- it's as if by unfocusing the mind, the mind is becomes clearer, it becomes a conduit. My best poems are almost always automatic.

Tangent much?

J
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 04-21-2012, 09:30 PM
Vernon Sims Vernon Sims is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Irving TX USA
Posts: 623
Default

It is a long-held idea in critical thought that the ego must suspend judgement in order for the creative process to function, however, and this is the key point, it must step back in and exercise judgement to finish the process. A chimpanzee may eventually write great literature if allowed to use a keyboard, but an ego must eventually make sense of it all. The surrealists/dadaists may belittle the ego but it is the ego that recognizes their usefulness..
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Unread 04-21-2012, 10:15 PM
R. Nemo Hill's Avatar
R. Nemo Hill R. Nemo Hill is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Halcott, New York
Posts: 9,870
Default

Still and all, it is an interesting experiment to place the ego only on the receiving end, only as the audience. No one is saying this replaces any other kind of work--it's just another angle of investigation.

Nemo
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Unread 04-21-2012, 10:38 PM
W.F. Lantry's Avatar
W.F. Lantry W.F. Lantry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Inside the Beltway
Posts: 4,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R. Nemo Hill View Post
scandalous! What will become of literature?!
Ha! Exactly, Nemo.

So in 1950, seriously, 1950, Vonnegut wrote a story called Epicac. You can read all about it here. In the early 70's, people were using LISP to generate text strings. There's nothing new about any of this, the arguments all happened years ago, there's no point in getting worked up about it now.

It was relatively easy to write a program for playing chess. The game seems complicated, but it's mathematically reducible. Now even a dumb program, one you can run on your PC, can outplay the best human in the world.

In the 90's, people were using Linux to make self-learning bots who could teach themselves to play checkers. They got better and better as they played. They could run a thousand games a day. Does anyone really think they won't catch up? Yes, language is far more complex than chess. But Moore's law still holds.

There's an amusing joke here. We were always taught that a good metaphor takes two disparate concepts and links them, finds their previously unimagined connections. It was the very measure of a great poet. That one goes all the way back to Aristotle. And that was exactly the same technique the bots used to overcome the spam filters. Over a decade ago.

Somewhere out there some english major who knows how to code is staring at a screen right now. Her idea of poetry doesn't begin and end with Jabberwocky, a coder favorite. And she doesn't care about the silly pop culture stuff this Bok guy is writing about. She's hard coding for hard lit. And when we see what she's doing, she's going to blow us away with what she can achieve...

Best,

Bill
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



Forum Right Top
Forum Left Bottom Forum Right Bottom
 
Right Left
Member Login
Forgot password?
Forum LeftForum Right


Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 8,399
Total Threads: 21,839
Total Posts: 270,790
There are 2540 users
currently browsing forums.
Forum LeftForum Right


Forum Sponsor:
Donate & Support Able Muse / Eratosphere
Forum LeftForum Right
Right Right
Right Bottom Left Right Bottom Right

Hosted by ApplauZ Online