There's a fairly in-depth review of Dana's Interrogations at Noon
by Matthew Brennan in the March/April American Book Review
. An excerpt is available online
It seems to me an accurate review, without a lot of the underlying biases that often haunt such reviews (such as the not-so-underlying biases in the recent review of Rhina's work). It would be interesting to hear what other eratospherians think--maybe the biases are there, but I'm just not seeing them. ..
(3 days from New Orleans!)
[This message has been edited by Chryss Yost (edited March 04, 2002).]