Eratosphere Forums - Metrical Poetry, Free Verse, Fiction, Art, Critique, Discussions Able Muse - a review of poetry, prose and art

Forum Left Top

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 03-30-2002, 10:49 AM
Michael Juster Michael Juster is offline
Distinguished Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Belmont MA
Posts: 4,802
Post

Tom: The answer for the most part is "no", with a couple of significant exceptions. I generally like to read a poem in a way that makes me think about myself and the world, and generally react negatively if I feel that the poet has unnecessarily thrust his or her persona upon me. Similarly, I hate going to a reading and having to listen to 5 minutes of preamble and an explanation of the "real" events and a gloss on the poem because it is too obscure. Read the damn poem and get out of the way!
Now, I feel differently when I actually know the poet because it is fascinating to hear the verbal tics in the poem that are part of the poet's speech or note the psychological fingerprints of a piece of art of someone you know. I also feel differently about certain great poets for whom I have made the effort to read the biographies and the criticism. Byron, Larkin, Dickinson and Swift fascinate me as people, for instance (even though my estimation of ED's work is lower than most of my peers), and I often do think about these poets as people as I read their stuff. I'm not so interested when the life is short and destructive (fill in many blanks there) or the art seems totally separated from the artist (Stevens). I mean, reading Stevens' biography is reading the life of a dull insurance lawyer who in his youth who would occasionally hang out with NYC literary bohemians. You can't connect the life with the art in a meaningful way, and so there seems to be no point. (OK, that will probably get me into trouble)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 03-30-2002, 04:45 PM
Robt_Ward Robt_Ward is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Cape Cod, MA, USA
Posts: 4,586
Post

OK, You're in trouble, then!

The fact that you cannot connect the life with the art in "meaningful way" is, in itself, meaningful.

jejeje

(robt)

------------------
(The former bear_music, in his own name)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 03-31-2002, 04:41 PM
Kate Benedict's Avatar
Kate Benedict Kate Benedict is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: New York, NY, USA
Posts: 2,196
Post

The word "character" implies more than biographical detail, though. Think Martin Luther King and his comment about judging a man on "the content of his character."

So if a bio portrays an admired poet as a cad, a wuss, a wife-beater, fill-in-the-blank, does it affect your appreciation of the poetry? Yeah, yeah, it "shouldn't." But does it?


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 03-31-2002, 06:06 PM
Michael Juster Michael Juster is offline
Distinguished Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Belmont MA
Posts: 4,802
Post

Generally not, Kate. Sometimes it seems the great poets fall into two categories--the jerks and the ones we don't know enough about to confirm that they were jerks (New Formalists (ahem) excepted, of course). Without some latitude on the morals of poets, I'd be stuck reading fiction. At some point when the product of the bad character spills into the content of the poetry--such as some of Pound's vile stuff--it does color my thinking, and I guess at that point it's OK. There must have been a few good doobies out there--Borges maybe? WC Williams (despite the awful poetry)? Even Petrarch--who took minor orders in the Catholic Church-- fathered illegitimate children with another woman as he was longing for Laura.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 04-01-2002, 01:47 AM
Susan McLean Susan McLean is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Iowa City, IA, USA
Posts: 10,090
Post

I once heard a professor say that to be a good writer you had to be a good person. I had to stifle a chortle, because I had read enough biographies of great writers to know that many of them were not exactly moral examples. I don't expect any better behavior from a great writer than from anyone else, and I don't feel I need any saints to worship. However, I do enjoy finding out about the lives of writers, because I think it often gives me insight into their works. Sometimes that insight does make me think less of the person and I suppose that has an effect on my reaction to the works, but good writing is good writing.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 04-01-2002, 07:58 AM
Roger Slater Roger Slater is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 16,475
Post

Everything I've ever read by or about John Keats confirms that he was a wonderful person and an exemplary character. Reading his letters, I'm always struck by the genuine, caring, thoughtful, attentive voice. Even his attitude toward poetry involved serving the public good. If there's any dirt on John Keats the man, I've not heard it.

I don't know that a great poet has to be a good person in his private life, but a great poet does have to have a finely developed sense of morality and decency and purpose in order to write his or her poems. I don't think there are any great poems that are non-ironic arguments in favor of "evil" or immorality. Even poems that don't express compassion nonetheless demand it of the reader to a certain extent. The reader has to "identify" and, to a certain extent, approve of what's being said (or at least not object to it).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 04-02-2002, 06:01 PM
Tim Murphy Tim Murphy is offline
Lariat Emeritus
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fargo ND, USA
Posts: 13,816
Post

If character were the only test, I'd have to burn Yeats and Frost, let alone lesser lights like myself, and confine my reading of the Moderns to Wilbur.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 04-03-2002, 12:21 AM
Solan Solan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Grimstad, home of Ibsen and Hamsun
Posts: 833
Post

Some of my favourite writers were "bad" characters indeed. But what's good, what's bad, if not what they leave behind? If character was to be the sole yardstick of human achievement, we (Oog and Grok) would still be virtuously clinging to each other in the trees.

---

Svein Olav

.. another life

[This message has been edited by Solan (edited April 03, 2002).]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



Forum Right Top
Forum Left Bottom Forum Right Bottom
 
Right Left
Member Login
Forgot password?
Forum LeftForum Right


Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 8,399
Total Threads: 21,839
Total Posts: 270,784
There are 2732 users
currently browsing forums.
Forum LeftForum Right


Forum Sponsor:
Donate & Support Able Muse / Eratosphere
Forum LeftForum Right
Right Right
Right Bottom Left Right Bottom Right

Hosted by ApplauZ Online