Première Issue 

Autumn 1999

      
 
 

 

 

    


Misha Gordin

   

     

 

 

                      

        

             

 

 

   

                                   

Artist's Statement  

 

 


 

l    

art showart showart show
art showart showart show
art showart showart show
  
Conceptual Photography

 

 

 

 

         

 

   

I was born in 1946, the first year after World War II. My parents just survived hardships of evacuation and returned back home to Riga, now under Soviet occupation. I grew up among the Russian speaking population of Latvia, and Russian culture become my root culture. I graduated from the technical college as aviation engineer but never worked as such; instead I joined Riga Motion Studios as a designer of equipment for special effects. I was in my early twenties and mostly ignorant about art. At this time social realism was an official culture of the country and I did not care about it too much. Information about modern western art was hardly available and my knowledge of it was highly limited. I started to photograph when I was nineteen, driven by desire to create my own personal style and vision. I was involved in portraiture and did some documentary shots, but soon realized the results did not satisfy me.

I put my camera aside and concentrated on reading (Dostoevsky, Bulgakov) and cinematography (Tarkovsky, Parajanov). I was constantly looking for the way to express my personal feelings and thoughts using photography. One year later it came to me clear and simple. I decided to photograph Concepts.

In 1972 I created my first, and most important image - Confession. I instantly recognized the potential possibilities of conceptual approach, and the knowledge acquired from this image become a backbone of the work I produced over the next twenty five years.

In 1974, after years of disgust with communist authorities, I left my country and arrived in USA.

Conventional versus Conceptual.

Do I point my camera outwards to the existing world, or turn it inward towards my soul? Am I taking photographs of existing reality, or creating my own world, so real but non-existent?

Results from these two opposite approaches are notably different and, in my opinion, conceptual photography is a higher form of artistic expression that places photography on the level of painting, poetry, music and sculpture. It employs the special talent of intuitive vision. By translating the personal concepts into the language of photography, it reflects the possible answers to major questions of being: birth, death and life. Creating an idea and transforming it into reality is an essential process of conceptual photography .

Today's conventional approach, with a few exceptions, completely dominates Art Photography. But introduction of digital photography will change this balance. The ease of producing altered realities will bring a new wave of talented artists who will use it to express their special world of visions, with all its meanings, symbols and mystery.

In a world of high technology will you still believe in truthfulness of a photograph? And does it matter?

To me it matters. In all these years of creating conceptual images, I tried to make them as realistic as possible. My technical abilities have improved, allowing me to broaden horizons for my ideas. But this is not the most important part of the process. The poor concept, perfectly executed, still makes a poor photograph. Therefore, the most important ingredient of the powerful image is a concept. The blend of a talent to create a concept and the skill to deliver it those are two major building blocks of creating a convincing conceptual photograph.

It is not a new idea to manipulate photographic images. As a matter of fact all images are manipulated to a certain degree. The real power of photography emerges when altered reality is presented as existent and is expected to be perceived as such. An obviously manipulated image is a trick that shows a lack of understanding of the unique power of photography the belief engraved in our subconscious that what was captured by the camera has to exist. In the best examples of successfully manipulated images the question "Is it real?" does not arise.

My first introduction to digital manipulations showed me how similar analog and digital techniques are. Each has it's bright and dark spots. At this moment I don't see any reason to switch to digital. I still prefer the glowing quality of original print and the laborious process to achieve it. Yet, I believe that it is only matter of time before digital approach replaces the analog and conceptual transcends the conventional. I also want to believe that, many years from now, artists will continue to develop the language of photography, understanding and preserving its unique power.

                     

 

 

        

 

 

your comments to Misha Gordin

                    

 

         

          

  

      

 
     

 

                  

     Able Muse

   

Contents