Although half my work is free verse, I find making it more difficult than making formal verse. I find myself being hyper-keen to cadence and turns, and the eventual shape of the poem. If publication were to be the best marker of my success at free verse, I have a poem, "Grappling," in The Southern Review that rests on many formal, rhythmic elements. Yet, because of its rather complex narrative and graphic stucture, it looks unlike a received form
and, I would guess, qualifies in the editor's ear as free verse.

As far as the triggers of free verse poetry, I find them in things people say, in things I discover in dictionaries, in articles I read in, say, Scientific American. I generally hear, or intuit a lovely contradiction, an irony, or just something bull goose looney. And from that, I take off and let my imagination and the poems sounds lead me.

I'd say that half of my published poems are what critics would call free verse, but each rides on my ear, which hears iambs everywhere, even in road signs.

Bob

Because there are so many kinds of poetry, I would guess that there are many ways of starting a poem. I am in love with closure (which many people would consider a fault). It means that I often start with the end of a poem. I also love paradox and pun, so I have a long list of titles that I would like to use someday if I can find my way into the idea they embody. Often I will get an opening line, too, and work from that. But I don't tend to find that I start with something that winds up in the middle of the poem.