![]() |
David, ah, I missed the legal references. I see--the first sentence makes perfect sense if “encumbrance” is taken to mean a “mortgage on property or other assets.” The land doesn’t have that, but it still has other, natural obstacles: I really like this distinction, but I just worry about how many people will catch it by taking “encumbrance” as you intended it. Apparently I’m not the only one who didn’t.
Quote:
Quote:
|
For me, having raised sheep and been distinctly unimpressed by their capacity for deep thought, "Scrambling out of the metaphor, / take the paths worn out by sheep / in their thoughful musings" simply evokes the expression "wool-gathering".
I had some trouble diagramming the following sentence, which seems to be two independent sentences spliced together so that the "although" clauses seem to modify the first, and then the second: To walk the land is to possess it on leases of a stride's length, each ceded easily, without encumbrance, although brambles may raise objections, mists intermeddle, petty fogs parlay you into dull circum- locutions, keep on. I would prefer to punctuate that as: To walk the land is to possess it on leases of a stride's length, each ceded easily, without encumbrance. Although brambles may raise objections, mists intermeddle, petty fogs parlay you into dull circum- locutions, keep on. That way, the "Although" clauses modify the circumstances under which the reader is exhorted to "keep on," rather than seeming only to contradict and undermine the modifiers "easily, without encumbrance." Their position might still allow that suggestion as well, but without committing to leaving that interpretation open as firmly as the comma splice seems to. Not sure I like making an expansive idea like "Unenclosed" so choppy (although I do like the lack of a full stop after it). Perhaps punctuate the last line as: and stands around you, unenclosed I liked the suggestion of a John Clare quotation about the enclosure of public lands, but can't recommend one in particular. Very nice, David. |
Hi David,
A lot to like here. I particularly like "lease" and how the opening seems to say that no one can truly possess the land. Also the the encumbrances -- the objecting brambles and petty fogs. I wonder if the reference to the Enclosures in "unenclosed" needs a little more to set it up. I do see the reference now you point it out. Maybe there's a way to use the title to do that? Or some reference to fences? The grammar of the first sentence wrongfoots me. Either change the comma after "encumbrance" to a full stop, or put a full stop after "circum-locutions". Otherwise it's hard to tell which clause attaches to which and how. The first of these two options seems to make more sense. I'm not sure what the meta move of "Scrambling out of the metaphor" gains you. Also, it seems like taking the paths of well-worn thought maybe is staying in the metaphor rather than scrambling somewhere fresh? Likely I'm missing something, but the poem seems to work just as well without that line. The stanza break you mention forgetting to add may well help here. "thoughtful musing" seems a bit flat to me, after all, it seems a bit like saying "thoughtful thought". Maybe find an adjective to replace "thoughtful" that conveys something of an image. I dunno, "cloven" or "woolly" or "slow-paced" or something else. best, Matt |
Thank you, Matt! Going through the comments, I was surprised that nobody else was bothered by the "Scrambling out of the metaphor" line until you came along. For me, it sideswiped a good poem. Cut that line and replace it with a stanza break and you're golden.
|
Just back to say that this might work as a Clare epigraph if you wanted one:
And birds and trees and flowers without a name All sighed when lawless law’s enclosure came It's from "The Mores" (as in "moors"), though I'm sure you knew that already. -Matt |
Hi David,
I read this and liked it when it first came up, and now that I've gotten back to it, I see it's gotten a good workout. I was also thrown by the seemingly unnecessary metaphor line. I think Michael's suggestion of a stanza break in its place is a good one. And I like Nemo's suggestion for the closing (unenclosing...) line. Rick |
Thanks all. I am posting a revision which takes account of a lot of the suggestions made by Alexandra, Julie, Matt, Michael and Rick on this page - not all of them, which may be a mistake, so I don't rule out further changes.
And I also have in mind the comments from Joe, Nemo, Jim, John and Phil on the previous page. I haven't attached a Clare epigraph yet, much as I like the idea (and the one suggested by Matt), simply because it doesn't seem quite right in a Manx context. Perhaps I'm being too parochial there. Cheers all David |
Yes!........
|
.
A perfectly good poem made better by careful revision. I think you've walked this one home. . |
Thanks, Michael, Jim. I think his has had its time in the sun now. It's enjoyed it.
Cheers all David |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.