![]() |
John, I thought your T.S. Eliot superb, incidentally. I'd be very surprised if you weren't a winner with that (but what do I know?) I can't for the life of me figure out the saurian reference, though.
|
Thank you, Rob. I knew what I meant when I wrote it but I've forgotten. I'll get back to you on it.
|
Emily Dickinson’s Rules for Writing:
1.−Tell it slant− 2. Capitalize−common Nouns− 3. Make the Lexicon− your only Companion− 4. –Dabble in linguistic surprise− 5.−Make the Abstract tangible− 6 .−Dwell in Possibility− |
Rob. I think 'saurian' is really about the way Eliot always seems so OLD, not to his actual appearance. Old and cold, don't you know. Does tht make sense?
|
Not sure, John. Seems a tad obscure to me.
|
C’mon, now -- if Eliot doesn’t seem lizard-y, are Radcliffe and Smith and McKellen not wizard-y?
|
O Rob, all this OLD stuff... an old man in a dry month... why should the aged eagle stretch his wings...I grow old, I grow old, I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled.. and dry stuff too... and desert stuff ... dust, dust, dust of dust..
Lizardy. Definitely. Tennyson is wizardy. |
Fair enough.
|
Eliot's world-weary whinge, 'Why should the aged eagle spread his wings?' got short shrift from Edmund Wilson, who pointed out that the poet was barely in his 40s at the time.
|
John, perhaps you were thinking of William Plomer's 'The Playboy of the Demi World: 1938'?
D'Arcy Honeybunn has 'The eyes of some old saurian in decay' |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.