![]() |
As I understand it, the no index tag inserted when posting a new poem only works on that first page of the thread. If someone quotes the poem, or parts of it, on another page after that, a search can reveal it, unless the first post on that page, or the post with the quote, also has the no index tag. Can anyone confirm this?
|
Quote:
I can't confirm that "noindex" coding in the quoting post would hide things, but it seems it should. |
That's news to me. I was under the impression, apparently mistaken, that the no-index tag worked on all subsequent posts in the same thread.
At any rate, I'm quite sure that I have seen many, many poems that were workshopped here at Eratosphere appear in many, many journals whose policy is not to take previously published poems. I would not suggest trying to deceive an editor whose guidelines make clear that they regard posting to a workshop as "publication," but most guidelines that prohibit prior publication do not make clear that they hold this less-than-obvious view, and indeed, many journals do not regard posting to a workshop as prior publication. So it seems to me that in those cases it's fair to resolve the ambiguity in your own favor, but also take steps (like using no-follow tags) to minimize the chance that anyone who is not a regular at Eratosphere might stumble upon your poem here instead of reading it first in the magazine in question. |
Some editors are lovely people. Others are POWER-CRAZED MADMEN. Others are much like you and me.
|
Eratosphere
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Eratosphere is the largest online workshop for formal poetry …..founded in 1999 by Alexander Pepple as a workshop complement to Able Muse. Eratosphere moderators have included some of the best known formal poets, including Marilyn Taylor -- The Poet Laureate of Wisconsin, A. M. Juster, A. E. Stallings, R. S. Gwynn, and several others. The Distinguished Guest forum has hosted and continues to host presentations, and discussions with renowned writers and poets such as Richard Wilbur -- a former US Poet Laureate and two-time winner of the Pulitzer Prize for Poetry, the late Anthony Hecht, Timothy Steele, Charles Martin, X. J. Kennedy and others, and these discussions are permanently archived and accessible online. Thus, Eratosphere has become a useful research medium in academic and other circles to interactively gauge modern poetic trends and beliefs, being quoted as a reference for instance in Professor Susan Santovasi of Yale University on political poetry [1], besides being included in the listing of writing resources of several universities. I'm sure many will know this but it was surpise to me, I recently got strange responses from ezines I submitted to, saying, 'no but send us more' or giving a glowing, detailed response but then saying 'no thanks'. Never before had a reject that wasn't just a form letter. Now if I decide to submit I'll stick to poems I havn't posted here. ah, the price of fame.. cheers Ross |
I found this in our FAQ:
Quote:
|
I think this is a big fuss over nothing. I've published in about fifty different venues - print and internet combines - almost everything I've published has been workshopped on the Sphere - and nobody has ever come back to me and complained about the Sphere. And I generally use the same title (unless I decide to change it as part of the usual rewrite process) for workshop and publication. The only people who seem to bend themselves in pretzels over this are some of our Spherians. And I haven't heard anybody - except for the New Statesman Competition, and I'm not even sure if that's in effect or just talked about by somebody who doesn't understand the Sphere - cite any actual instances of having work turned down because it was workshopped here. Relax!
|
I've been on the verge of trying to reply to this because I'd never really understood these code-things and was intrigued, though not unduly concerned. I believed that Alex had taken care of it in the workshop forums, from the bottoms of which, in the fullness of time, the workshopped work drips like juice from an over-ripe plum onto the fertile soil of forgettery.
Now, since we are not allowed to post any of our own work in the "other" forums, surely there can be no problem, and the giving of funny titles to work-in-progress to confound the wicked Beelzebots just troubles the cheerful innocents among us for no good reason. Innit? The only reason to protect anything in these forums might be when quoting the work of someone else which is effectively in copyright, but that's a different issue. Michael, the New Statesman issue was very real, brought up by the journal and solved by the combined efforts of the member with whom they raised it and Alex who fixed it. And John, remember - some Editors are Sphere members! Be Very Afraid! |
the Wiki article I quoted is recent.
All codes can be overidden by a better code, all poems can be searched by a search engine, they'd be apps available. If you were a ezine publisher you would want your poems to be unpublished in any medium, it's your show, you'd want it all original. Wouldn't good ezine editors put all poems through an indexing/ keyword app to screen out poems previously published on the net, it's simple to do, changing the title makes no difference. A search engine searches all keywords and finds a probability match. on the other hand ezine editors might like poems already popular on a forum if they were unsure of their own abilities…I like forums, don't read ezines, I like the friendship here. |
Quote:
As for editors being our friends? Well, sometimes that's true. But for anyone who thinks that's a good general rule, I've got a bridge to sell you in Arizona... ;) Best, Bill |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.