![]() |
One thing I want from poetry is music. Donald Justice gives me that, whether you lineate it or not.
|
Dear Tom
I would like to make a friendly suggestion. Often you find yourself unable to share the poetic enthusiasms of others. There is, of course, nothing wrong with that: we are, each of us, entitled to our own enthusiasms. I confess, however, that I sometimes think I have missed the point of the criticisms you level at passages others have admired. Here is my suggestion. Why not post for us some poems which you admire, briefly explaining their virtues as you see them and showing the ways in which they do not suffer from the faults you find in poems others have posted? Let such poems and passages serve as the touchstones for Tom Jardine’s taste in verse. I think that might be interesting. Kind regards… Clive |
Well, dang. I logged in to suggest what i see Clive has already suggested. Second the motion. I'm bery inetersted in seeing what DOES work for Tom Jardine, a man I find endlessly fascinating simply because his taste is so contrary to mine...
(robt) For the record, I think Justice is one of the fienst poets of the last half of the 20th century... |
Yeah Tom. Who's the man? This should be good.
|
|
Clive, Good idea. I don't like being negative. So I will put a few points together, but since I moved a few months ago I don't have all my books out the garage, so a day or so... Sharon, thanks for the link, which to me, substantiates what I am trying to say. He sounds like a hundred other readings I have attended. TJ |
I don't disagree with you, TJ, I just think you have no idea what you're talking about. And I think I'll skip the poems
that you nominate as good. The Sandburg went over my annual limit and I'm too old to overdo it. |
TJ, I'd like to see what you consider very good poetry. I may not agree with all your left-brain right-brain hoo hah but it's nice to get a different perspective.
-eaf |
Busy, Busy.
I can’t find any of my books. What poets? First, I’d like to start with living poets. I hope no one goes, well, sure, we know, or say that I am taking a safe bet. It is not a safe bet, it is what I think, although I must add that there is a factor of ‘let’s see’ how things go with this poet. And by no means is this poet perfect, but she is doing things few others are doing now. It is possible she sees the future of poetry more than others, but maybe she is just paying attention to the art, and, she may well leave many in the dust because she does pay attention to critical items in the art. My disclaimer is that I do not know Alicia Stallings except a what is here on erato, and my claim is that I personally try to give credit where credit is due. It is interesting to me that the poets I do like are all women, Stallings, Rhina Espaillat, Deborah Warren, and a few others, except one male who I will mention in a later segment to this, (along with Wilbur) who I see as addressing the art with integrity, which to me is the most important factor in any art. I bring this male-female fact up because I haven’t figured out exactly why this is, except maybe the men write arguments, points without wisdom, with issues rather than presentations. (Fred Longworth has a great poem, but he seems totally unknowable right now to me. I will add the male poet in another segment for a reason.) The idea of this is to construct what and why I like a poet, Stallings. Here is in full the first poem in the latest Poetry. And then I will go through some of it and then compare the sense with some other poetry in the same issue. Prelude Lately, at the beginning of concerts when The first-chair violin Plays the A 4-40 and the bows Go whirring about the instruments like wings Over unfingered strings, The cycling fifths, spectral arpeggios, As the oboe lights the pure torch of the note, Something in my throat Constricts and tears are startled to my eyes, Helplessly. And lately when I stand Torn ticket in my hand In the foyers of museums I surprise You with a quaver in my rote reply— Again I overbrim And corners of the room go prismed, dim. You’d like to think that it is Truth and Art That I am shaken by, So that I must discharge a freighted heart; But it is not when cellos shoulder the tune, Nor changing of the key Nor resolution of disharmony That makes me almost tremble, and it is not The ambered afternoon Slanting through motes of dust a painter caught Four hundred years ago as someone stands Opening the blank Future like a letter in her hands. It is not masterpieces of first rank, Not something made By once-warm fingers, nothing painted, played. No, no. It is something else. It is something raw That suddenly falls Upon me at the start, like loss or awe— The vertigo of possibility— The pictures I don’t see, The open strings, the perfect intervals. The sound and sense match in every sentence, and the notes in the music are fully human, individually human, you can hear it. The subject is interesting; haven’t we all felt something like this entering a museum or at the start of a concert? Here are some running notes, as I call it. Lately, at the beginning of concerts when The first-chair violin Plays the A 4-40 and the bows Go whirring about the instruments like wings Over unfingered strings, The cycling fifths, spectral arpeggios, As the oboe lights the pure torch of the note, Something in my throat Constricts and tears are startled to my eyes, Before I know it, I am taken to a place of images and sound—off and running, as it were, and I am no longer reading a poem—how many poems have you read that you just know you are reading a poem? Who wants to read a poem? Nobody! The reader wants to connect, to feel compassion with another person, not read another poem. Helplessly. And lately when I stand Torn ticket in my hand Let’s take a look at this line. And lately when I stand torn ticket in my hand… The reader is drawn in empathically because “I stand torn ticket’ instantly melds the image in the reader mind AND keeps the sound, the sound of a person trying to express something. In the foyers of museums I surprise You with a quaver in my rote reply— Again I overbrim And corners of the room go prismed, dim. Again I overbrim and the corners of the room go prismed, dim. Quite frankly, this is a very pretty line, and the sound gets the message across. There is a mild dramatic emphasis between … prismed, dim. Here, I will add to take note of some word usage: unfingered, startled to, overbrim, go prismed, freighted heart, ambered afternoon, once-warm, shoulder the tune; each one is original, concise, effective. You’d like to think that it is Truth and Art That I am shaken by, So that I must discharge a freighted heart; But it is not when cellos shoulder the tune, Nor changing of the key Nor resolution of disharmony Now when is the last time you had a conversation with anyone in the world about the ‘resolution of disharmony’? I can’t speak for anyone else, but this is the world I live in myself, highly concerned with the resolution of disharmony, art as making order out of chaos, beauty as opposed to pleasure, love as clarity, and so on. That makes me almost tremble, and it is not The ambered afternoon Slanting through motes of dust a painter caught Four hundred years ago as someone stands Opening the blank Future like a letter in her hands. It is not masterpieces of first rank, Not something made By once-warm fingers, nothing painted, played. No, no. It is something else. It is something raw That suddenly falls Upon me at the start, like loss or awe— The vertigo of possibility— The pictures I don’t see, The open strings, the perfect intervals. Well done. Here, I find myself sensing that the poet has more to say, and draws me closer with curiosity. The poem is tuned. Here are some comparative lines by other poets from the same issue. Compare the lack of voice and sounds. No snowfall is so quiet As the first one; the details The white obscures are so fresh. Capsize once in a while, in water Like that you die, that’s all, that water Isn’t even frozen. A dove is not bird. You can make the argument in reverse, but it’s not as convincing because it lacks those tangible elements by which we measure… There will be no trees there, no split-barked sycamore ascending, spirit and flesh caught in rough metaphor, My evangelical brethren have let me know, via the quarterly fundraising letter, that they can’t get the gospel around because their van has given up the ghost. Late August was a pressure drop, rain, a sob in the body, a handful of air with a dream in it. Rooms may be using us. We may be the agents of doorknobs’ purposes, obeying imperatives china dreams up or The above segments leave me dull and tired to look at them. More later, any comments welcome. TJ |
Booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.