![]() |
Poetry
Why is everything in the October issue terrible? Is this the mark of the new editor? Am I just in a bad mood?
|
I don't know about your mood but it looks pretty terrible to me. I hate people droning on about difficult poetry for a start. What happened to easy poetry like Keats and stuff?
|
I was going to comment but anyone can click that link and find comment enough.
|
Hm, should I feel even worse then, to be rejected this issue? :o
|
The Reverdy translation by Lydia Davis is pretty cool.
|
Yes, to the Reverdy.
Nemo |
Not at all, Janice. Salon de Refuses and all that. There should be an accent of some sort there.
|
I must confess to loving this letter:
http://www.poetryfoundation.org/poet.../letter/246536 I don't love it because it's right, but because it's wrong in such a way as to illustrate something that's terribly wrong with American poetry--its adherence to fairly irrelevant (and certainly outdated) struggles. As for the issue as a whole, I thought the poems by dead people were good. |
Poems by dead people are always best. Except in our cases, Quincy. And some Spherians here and there.
What language! I'll bet the bloke's a little person. |
The letter is a lot of fun. I enjoy anything attacking the insufferable Michael Robbins.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.