![]() |
Sleeping Out at Easter
All dark is now no more. The forest is drawing a light. All presences change into trees. One eye opens slowly without me. My sight is the same as the sun’s, For this is the grave of the king, When the earth turns, waking a choir. All dark is now no more. Birds speak, their voices beyond them. A light has told them their song. My animal eyes become human As the Word rises out of the darkness As my right hand, buried beneath me, Hoveringly tingles, with grasping The source of all song at the root. Birds speak, their voices beyond them. The above is the first two stanzas of a poem by James Dickey…and not one of his best. It is conspicuously written in an anapestic trimeter— a meter Dickey employed frequently in his early volumes of poetry which qualified him as a Formalist for a while. The meter loosened as the years passed: I lay in the country and dreamed Of the substance and course of the river While the different colors of fever Like quilt patches flickered upon me. At last I arose, with the poison Gone out of the seam of the scar, And brought my wife eastward and weeping, Through the copper fields springing alive With the promise of harvest for no one. The Poisoned Man (conclusion) Eventually Dickey wrote in a kind of free-verse that approximated tetrameter or trimeter, iambic or anapestic, in various combinations— running from about 8 to 12 syllables. It is basically normative of what has become the Mainstream style of post-WWII American poetry. Dickey may not have been the first to craft a style like this, but he’s one of the best, and supplies a clear example. It all starts with Williams, of course. Williams apprenticed himself in Late-Victorian metered verse…and occasionally wrote nearly-metered pieces as a mature poet— eg. The Yachts and The Kermiss— apparently for fun, and old time’s sake. Meantime, he liberated himself in the Early-Modernist minaturist models…learning to write with terse phrasing, short lines and breathless enjambment. Not much rhythm inside the line though— the compressed spaces of minaturism simply won’t allow it. When Williams became dissatisfied with these constraints he let his line stretch out a bit— to about 6 to 10 syllables— while keeping the sharp enjambments and rapidly shifting line lengths he’d become accustomed to from his minaturist practice: his line could once again become a convincing vehicle for rhythm and discrete units of sense. Williams’ line could carry 3-4 accents, as well as the 1-2 common in minaturist poetry. One senses that Williams himself never became entirely comfortable with the new rhythmic space he’d provided for himself. He saw himself as a conscious adversary of the entire metrical Tradition, and so deliberately crafted his lines to make them as little as possible resemble regular trimeters and tetrameters. He also pursued a vague adherence to the same Realist aesthetic as Edgar Lee Masters, which exerted a further constraint against anything that sounded “lyrical” or “musical” in his verse (bad things in a poem?). A kind of extreme parody of Williams’ evolved-style was faddish in the 80’s, and rightly or wrongly was known as “Iowa School”, after the influential MFA program. The consistently enjambed lines and varied line-lengths, together with the studiedly pedestrian content, defeat any experience of this dull and uninspired “writing” as poetry at all, whether heard or read silently. Most of it’s adherents had to seek some external validation in the swarmy Political Correctness of the period. The “movement” is dead pretty much anywhere outside New York (the great tail-ender of modern American literature). In New York, the tin-earred (indeed, wholly insensible) critic Helen Vendler still promotes this type of life-less verse. It’s a consistent hypothesis of mine that aspects of metrical tradition that are side-lines within that tradition can be mined to awesome effect when taken just outside the strictures of that tradition. Even a poet of Robert Frost’s promethean abilities could not lift the trimeter or tetrameter line above it’s non-serious connotations…as long as he wrote regular trimeter or tetrameter. But look what happens when you loosen them up. Departure (for Tonya) Because it was a weekend morning, You lounged awhile in the dustlight Of your small room on 14th Street, In that house like an old movie set. I think maybe you sipped capuccino And smoked one ginseng cigarette, Watching the neon of the liquor store Lose itself under increasing sun And raising the window to let the reluctant Spring breeze bother your camisole, You danced a moment to no apparent Music--that city already strange. And already your dozen or so friends Seemed strangers. In one cruel week We'd turned away from you, as if To lose you before you were gone. Left utterly alone, there is nothing The heart can invent to numb itself. All around you on the hardwood floor, Your old life darkened in cardboard boxes. I think, now, of those twenty black hats, Black haloes your face paled under; Jewelry, photographs, a few precious books; Little shoes in which to make your exit. If love is an awkward, scriptless scene To be played out between two people, I cannot write it: I am a pattern Of breath and sleep that city will outlive. And if poetry is a bond between Two hearts, it is a bond too frail: That night words failed, I too, was lost-- To whiskey, memory, a photograph. East of that city, the green fields Are winding away beneath your gaze, And here, west of that city, there is No water deep enough to let me forget. If I could look forward, I could see us In Houston, in Atlanta--that South No train will take us to, that South We lost ourselves in so long ago. And those cities, so far removed In distance and time--can our small stars Survive those bright lights? Our language Be heard above the din of the million? Tonight, a hundred miles away, Our city, made of circles and squares, Must be much the same as it was: The bars, the buildings, the streets empty of lovers. It is a city we can never Return to--a dream, a green light, An unfound door closed upon the past. Our words echo through it and fade. Joe Bolton There are a lot of undergraduate features to the Bolton…but, seriously folks!— who wouldn’t rather read this, than say…Jorie Graham? |
Excellent exposition.
You have opened up the question of looseness or tightness within any formal structure. Some will follow rigorously, others will dance along the edges of the patterns. Kaufman (At Home in the Universe) notes that life itself exists on the precarious edge beteen order and chaos. I have an intuitive sense that there's a fractal geometry here; and that, not only do the structures of poems have an underlying fractal form, but that the ever-changing degree of adherence to form -- the very shape of compliance and non-compliance -- itself manifests a fractal pattern. Mathematically, we could call this a derivative function. The point, of course, is that the human aesthetic apparatus is likely hardwired to respond to fractal structure. By the way, I just got my latest Ploughshares and the guest editor is Jorie Graham. She has amassed a collection of obscure, turbid poems, or should I call them "word puzzles"? I couldn't find a single poem I'd want to have coffee with, though a few would do well as napkins. Fred |
i think this form is defined visually, by
the oblong of gray that it makes on the page. there is also a typical length, & one of my constant frustrations in poetry workshop was that poets would never stop writing until they had filled up a page & a half. they couldn't seem to understand that a poem generates its own internal dynamic, & finishes when it is done. but then, a lot of them couldn't grasp line-ending notation either. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.