View Single Post
  #6  
Unread 11-09-2009, 12:03 AM
Philip Quinlan Philip Quinlan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,666
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Childers View Post
I see no reason to be dogmatic about the definition of the term.
Chris
Well, I ain't no classicist, but I agree. To me an ekphrasis is something which:

1) Is occasioned by another work, or form, of art in some way.
2) References it in some way.
3) Celebrates it in some way.
4) Doesn't necessarily restrict itself to description (which seems pointless unless you are trying to describe a painting to a blind man - actually, pointless even then). A work of art describes itself, non?

Philip

Last edited by Philip Quinlan; 11-09-2009 at 12:39 AM.
Reply With Quote