It's certainly good enough to win, John, but I did wonder about what you're asking. In your favor, it doesn't actually make factual assertions about Blair, except to say he is a liar (and that's a fair opinion to have about literally any politician who ever existed), but there is the issue of seeming to be threatening violence against him. I know, of course, that this isn't really a fair way of reading the poem, and that if you yourself met Blair you would probably be polite enough not to attempt his murder, but if some crazy person were to kidnap Blair and fry his privy parts in camel lard after reading your poem, the Spectator would be in a bad spot.
Problem is, rewriting the ending to avoid a specific person would blunt the whole poem. I think that one of the reasons poems like mine are falling a bit flat is that they are too generic so they don't seem genuine. Yours can't be accused of the same.
|