There is a difference between being clever and being right.
The constant allegation that urinating on pages of the Koran in Gitmo as being a crime greater than Islamic Terrorists blowing up an Islamic Mosque full of worshippers and the subsequent mixing of pages of the Islamic Holy Book with the blood, guts and URINE of the dismembered men, women, and children, in the mosque is abominable coming from such supposedly intelligent people
If you are looking for a way to beat up on Bush there are two easy ways of doing it. Sue Sean Hannity and Fox News Corp –(repeatedly) for ‘constructive slander and libel’ over the character assassination of Michael Schiavo (assuming Shiavo has clean hands). The government has used the legal theory of “constructive everything” for years to get organized crime figures. The legal theory has a long pedigree. For those not familiar with the concept of ‘Constructive’—in this case, it means that Sean Hannity and Fox did nothing wrong in each individual act taken by itself (and the case would be thrown out because of the First Amendment) -- but everything taken together would form a ‘constructive conspiracy’ (which then becomes a crime). Every time it is thrown out—appeal it up—and keep it in the media constantly until the next election. The Feds would not want to willingly give up one of their best tools against organized crime and would probably encourage Fox to throw Hannity over the side—and to cool it.
The second way to get Bush is the “Dukakis question”. “If one of Bush’s kids came down with a disease that embryonic stem cell research had a solid and proven treatment that would cure her—would Bush refuse treatment for her on religious grounds.
Just repeat the question over and over—mention it as many times as the Koran going down the john at Gitmo and by election time the Republicans would play hell holding onto their majority.
Now, if we could only find a democrat with an IDEA.
Dick Morgan
|