Quote:
Originally Posted by Carolyn Thomas-Coxhead
I agree 100% with Chris: D and A is simply a workshop/blog with (as far as I can see) absolutely no axe to grind. No need to try to subvert anything.
...
It's beginning to look increasingly clear, from the correspondence between Vicky and Chris, that Vicky has just got the wrong end of the stick, quite innocently, I'm sure.
...surely good sense will prevail and we can continue sharing and honing our fun ideas without fear of losing that chance of a few ackers in the bank and, if lucky, the Tesco bonus.
|
I concur!
I also observe that usually minimal or no honing goes on in-forum; most entries seem to be simply posted here for shared enjoyment, not for collaborative improvement.
If joint work on entries had been seen as a problem (and it seems to me the only substantial objection one might raise to raise to our sharing here, as being a potential unfairness to solo entrants) then surely that reason would have been highlighted in emails sent.
Maybe indeed the mistaken perception was that ES was 'nicking' the comp idea from NS and pre-empting it somehow. I'll be glad to learn that misunderstanding has been set right and that the NS disqualification ruling can therefore be reversed.