My premise is exactly that GW/CC cannot be proved or un-proven as man-caused.You have a case for pollution, not heating and cooling of the earth that is caused by men.
Going back to the climate debate about global warming causing more intense hurricanes and more hurricanes in general, Global warming was blamed on Hurricane Andrew in 1992, along with every other hurricane since then. People went into hysteria over Katrina, but Rita was barely mentioned. And now, to cover their asses and their jobs, scientists and meteorologists claim Global Warming is deflecting hurricanes from our shores. If they don't make the claim, then they can't continue with the false science of it, which is where the East Anglia fiasco comes into play. They deliberately falsified evidence and cooked up models to reinforce untenable positions they took so that they could further a false agenda and keep their cushy jobs. It is clear no one here wants to talk about their (E.A.'s) deceit in an adult manner. It was minimized earlier in this thread and on down the road you guys trucked. Truth doesn't need to be manipulated. Lies do though. I haven't disparaged anyone here, just the lack of truthful, provable evidence that is missing from the conversation.
Bringing Christianity into the discussion to deflect from the debate is unhelpful, because you (some of you) seek to disparage me by doing so. It doesn't make sense, if you were being sincere, to do so. Throwing anti-Christian bombs doesn't bolster your position.
My advice to you would be to clean up your East Anglia mess before casting stones at Christianity. You won't do that though. I know why.
Tilt on.
|