Charlie: Your opinion on whether the Perez and Loving decisions were correct or not should either go hand in hand with your opinion on the current SCOTUS decision (in which case some interesting political questions arise) or not (in which other interesting philosophical questions on constitutional interpretation arise). If you could only focus on the issue of Perez and Loving, and take a stance, that would be wonderful. I'm sure I would learn something. And I suspect you would, too. But since you refuse, I will desist, not without first saying that I frankly don't understand your reluctance to answer the simple question I asked. You've not been shy about expressing your views on the current SCOTUS ruling, so why demure on these other two prior, somewhat related rulings? I've treated you respectfully (though I may have labeled you Southern or conservative incorrectly), and my questions stem from an earnest attempt at understanding how you see some deeply important matters of justice that I see strikingly differently.
Pedro
|