No, Julie, you still missed the point. I know very well what checks and balances and advice and consent are for. I did get a little lernin' in skool.
The only reason Fauxahontas stood up to deliver her soliloquy was to besmirch, smear and demean her own colleague, which she was rightfully shut down for. She is a parody of what a US Senator should be. I saw Senator's Byrd and Kennedy do the same to several Supreme Court nominees. You don't find Republican Senators in the modern era doing such things to SC nominees.
SInce it can't be proven that AG Sessions ever abused his power to disenfranchise any voter, black or white, it's kind of like asking him when did he stop beating his wife. That's one point. The second point is that Ms. Wampum Fawn knew he was going to be confirmed regardless of what she said, but by God, she was gonna say it come Hell or high water. It was a useless exercise. Defending her disengenuousness is disingenuous. Her politics is Statism. I hate her Statism, Julie, because it is Godless and goes against everything I believe as a Christian. It doesn't mean I don't pray for her.
I am all for raising legit questions about a nominee's qualifications and character, but not from the likes of someone who has no fidelity to fairness or prudence, and in fact, would destroy not only that nominee, but any Republican put forth by the President. It's what I hate about politics. It's gotcha' all the time.
Let the Senator who is without a stone cast the first fault.
James B. Since you don't know Cruz or Pence, especially Pence, I don't see how you can qualify Warren as any more or better of a Christian than either of them. She is a Statist, which separates her from Christian ideals. Christians usually give free testimony of their beliefs, James. Cruz and Pence have. I haven't seen Warren's testimony, have you?
|