Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark McDonnell
I don't know either. And yes, it sucks. I wish I had your confidence that Kim Jong Un wouldn't ever do something just because there was 'nothing to be gained' from it. After all, there's nothing to be gained from suicide bombings and they're literally...well, suicidal. To the individual who perpetrated them. But it doesn't seem to stop people. And The N Korean leaders mindset doesn't seem that much more stable than the average Jihadist lunatic to me. A little maybe, but not much.
|
I don't know where you getting any confidence on my part. I don't have any. I find a North Korean ICBM to me really bad news for humanity. No idea what it will mean.
Suicide bombings don't turn the entire nation into molten rock like a US response would. And a great deal of currency is gained in suicide bombings even if it is foreign to our sense of honor and our accepted means of killing. But I hear you. KJU is unstable. My point being the question of what action actually makes the use of the weapons by that regime less likely? I suspect the answer isn't becoming the steam release valve for Trump regime which will shortly be in dire need of something to fight "out there".