Thanks, Ralph; I shall take a look 8-) (glasses)
- - -
Yes, Duncan; M.A. Griffiths was mentioned, first by Julie I think, on my thread about New Formalism. I'm reading her poetry at the moment and finding a lot to enjoy :-)
- - -
Ann, welcome to this labyrinth. I'd be happy to help muck out any BS, if necessary.
I agree that there are likely to be a lot of 'freshes', which is why I added 'Fliss-' to the Freshometer mentioned by Mark Mc during his current thread on Met. I picked that up from Susan's post too.
You're welcome for the mention. You don't owe me a contribution, but I'm glad you feel you do. I like your self-definition and reflection thereon. The singular eye takes me, foolishly of course, to the Cyclops, but I peer through the sensible lenses and understand your point. I like startle, offend, amuse. The other way is interesting. Sometimes I have a sense of pulling a bucket up from a well, though contents vary. And matters may be complicated by perceptions of the poet (as I've mentioned, I've had difficulties elsewhere).
Thank you!
Fliss
|