[James Brancheau]

Hi Carl—I, too, am a master of that, believe me. I’m frankly embarrassed by some of my past interpretations. But your initial reading is correct, and your other interpretation isn’t wrong. How’s that? I rather like the idea of the string instrument lying around for years… Anyway, I’m relieved. Yes, they are love letters, love notes, etc. You were of course also correct about “flip” and have changed that. Thank you for your comments and the kind words.

Yes, Hilary, that’s what I intended re the close. I fear that both you and Glenn are right about the dampness. I’d like something more tactile there, so I’m trying “grainy.” There are other things I like about it, so I’m really hoping this does the trick. Thanks much for your input and the push.

Thanks for coming back, Richard. Ok, now I’m clear, I think, about what confused you. I guess I see enough of a connection between “note” and what follows to use the comma—though I do see how it abruptly changes gears there, hinges on the meanings of “note.” It’s kind of in the same vein as “squint to hear,” I guess. Or that’s how I see it anyway. I’d be interested to know if others have the same or similar issues with it. Very much appreciate your detailed attention to this.