Hi Harry,
Thanks for your feedback. I initially got the impression the two forms of "science" didn't match up for you, but your final summation made it clear that the interplay worked okay. I quite like that it wasn't/didn't seem to be a straightforward process for you, that you had to engage with the poem and work out how you felt about it (if I'm reading your experience with it correctly). I think poetry often works best on that level of not quite being sure about something, re-reading, potentially changing perception, at least to some degree.
Thanks again, Harry. Much appreciated.
Trev
|