View Single Post
  #56  
Unread 09-05-2008, 06:09 PM
Terese Coe Terese Coe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 7,489
Post

Steinem wrote the best article I've seen on this issue yet. [Nemo's link]

Here's an excerpt:

Here's the good news: Women have become so politically powerful that even the anti-feminist right wing -- the folks with a headlock on the Republican Party -- are trying to appease the gender gap with a first-ever female vice president. We owe this to women -- and to many men too -- who have picketed, gone on hunger strikes or confronted violence at the polls so women can vote. We owe it to Shirley Chisholm, who first took the "white-male-only" sign off the White House, and to Hillary Rodham Clinton, who hung in there through ridicule and misogyny to win 18 million votes.

But here is even better news: It won't work. This isn't the first time a boss has picked an unqualified woman just because she agrees with him and opposes everything most other women want and need. ...To vote in protest for McCain/Palin would be like saying, "Somebody stole my shoes, so I'll amputate my legs."


Oh, I don't think we have to worry about that "protest" [against Hillary losing the nomination] vote any longer! Moot point now.

Is it true Condi rejected the Veep nomination? No comment. It's another minefield.
Reply With Quote