Tim,
My point was simple - that critics are amusing - Logan, cleverly so. It's his job.
I think the mere fact that he chose Davis's work to critique in his own way, says a lot about the quality of the work. I really don't think that someone who couldn't write good poetry would even be worthy of his attention.
In this case, sarcasm appears to be the highest form of flattery. I don't see any need to defend Dick - his work does that by itself.
Nigel
|