"...oversight ... mishandling ..." - Well, it's painful to see someone try to use (say) rhyme and fail hopelessly - better not to try at all. One can sometimes guess the intentions of the writer, and see that - in terms of those intentions - they've failed. But unless one's part of a workshop I'm unsure how useful this method of measuring success is.
I don't think my reactions fall so often into one of these 2 categories - I usually offer myself (because of my narrowness of reading) an alien aesthetics alternative. Someone parachuting in from one culture to another might think that Nash and Muldoon mishandle - they're obviously aware of rhyme, but make a mess of it. Similarly plot and coherence are issues that writers play with.
People sometimes say that each piece of work requires a new aesthetic. I think it's an impracticable viewpoint if taken to excess, but I like the idea of the reader having loads of criteria whose relative ratios are adjustable according to the work under discussion (indeed, I suspect most readers work this way, guided by the genre, etc). At times one is asked to stretch these ratios further than one is used to. At this stage one might question the author's aesthetics while accepting that the writer achieved their intentions. Or one might - experimentally - suspend one's aesthetic disbelief
|