As you say, we cross-posted, Mark. With the additional material you are posting here, I am still drawing a blank on how Hillman has anything useful to say about metaphysics. I just can’t see the point of reducing it to psychology, even Hillman’s relatively ample and imaginative version of psychology. I certainly wouldn’t want to read Plotinus or Heidegger or any great metaphysician with those preconceptions. I’m interested in reading them in their own terms.
That's fascinating about the echo of Donne in Muir!
|