Nope. I mean posting them here. This wouldn't wouldn't result in rhizomatising the linearity (if that means what I think it does) since it would be clear which image or poem was being used to 'seed' the next round.
See? Seeds not rhizomes!
So, thusfar:
Jayne has posted a poem. Sarah-Jane has baggsed the image.
So let's say Sarah-Jane, you, me and Roger each write and post an image in response. However since Sarah-Jane baggsed it, hers 'seeds' the next round.
So, next someone, let's say it's you, baggses the poem to respond to Sarah-Jane's image. But even so, Jayne and I and also write a poem and post it. But since you baggsed the poem, it's yours that will be used as the seed for the next crop of images.
Like this:
Poem
..|
..|-----------------------------------------
..|
................|
...............|
...............|
baggsed
....image 2
....image 3
......etc
image
..|-----------------------------------------
..|
................|
...............|
...............|
baggsed
...poem 2
.....poem 3
........etc
poem
..|
..|-----------------------------------------
..|
................|
...............|
...............|
baggsed
....image 2
....image 3
......etc
image
I dunno, it just seems like it might be more if people can join in. Might still get messy at times, I guess. But with all these gardening metaphors, that's almost inevitable