Eratosphere Forums - Metrical Poetry, Free Verse, Fiction, Art, Critique, Discussions Able Muse - a review of poetry, prose and art

Forum Left Top

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 12-06-2009, 09:04 AM
Duncan Gillies MacLaurin's Avatar
Duncan Gillies MacLaurin Duncan Gillies MacLaurin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Saeby, Denmark
Posts: 3,227
Default Climategate

How come there’s no debate
about the recent climategate?
Don’t we care?
Or don’t we dare?
Well here you go. It’s not too late.

I assume most of you have seen this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ydo2Mwnwpac

Alan Sullivan has been annotating the story on his blog “Fresh Bilge”. Here’s one of his recent links:

CLIMATEGATE: CAUGHT GREEN-HANDED!
COLD FACTS ABOUT THE HOT TOPIC OF GLOBAL TEMPERATURE CHANGE AFTER THE CLIMATEGATE SCANDAL

http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/im...%20Scandal.pdf

Note that it's not a hacker who spilled the beans, as the mainstream media initially reported, but a whistleblower. And apparently the BBC sat on the whistleblower's file for a month...

What gets me is not so much the faking of evidence, a very serious thing in itself, but the ensuing attempt to cover it up. The thinking must have been to try to save the climate conference in Copenhagen. Duuuhhh!!!

Here’s Christopher Booker in today’s Telegraph, the only British newspaper as far as I can see that isn't playing ostrich:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/c...the-world.html

Just what the **** is going on?
Duncan
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 12-06-2009, 11:15 AM
David Landrum's Avatar
David Landrum David Landrum is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Grand Rapdis, Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,421
Default

Duncan--I think it's becasue this issue is like abortion, pacifism, etc. People have made up their minds and nothing is going to change them, so they aren't really interested in a debate or in evidence for or against the validity of the idea.

I think it's a primary example of what has not generally been said about the climate debate: the scientific community has a big stake it. If people believe that global warming or whatever you call it is occurring, science institutes and research universities will get billions in research monies, which, of course, they want. So they have a vested interest in frightening the general public with apocalyptic scenarios so they can then cash in on fear (rather like churches do). Just like "The Coming Ice-Age" back in the 1980s.

Since science has largely taken the place of religion for many people and speaks with the authoritative, prophetic voice that was formerly reserved for the Church or for self-styled prophets, people listen to it with the same passivity and gullability religious enthusiasts heeded such organizations and individuals in former ages.

dwl
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 12-06-2009, 11:41 AM
W.F. Lantry's Avatar
W.F. Lantry W.F. Lantry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Inside the Beltway
Posts: 4,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duncan Gillies MacLaurin View Post
Just what the **** is going on?
Duncan,

I don't understand the stakes people have in this. Whatever they are, they seem to have far more to do with political preference than actual reality. How so ever that may be, what strikes me is the tone of certainty some of the people jumping on this issue seem to be using. I've got three undergraduate credits in meteorology, and that makes me a bleeding expert compared to some of these people, and yet they get online and say things that imply that truth exists, and they have access to it. Some of these columnists are the same ones that applauded when ronald reagan said trees cause air pollution... What was in it for them then? What's in it for them now? And why all the extreme emotion?

Let's see... The ice shelves are breaking off Antarctica. Soon the Arctic will be ice free in summer, enough so that there'll be a northwest passage. Seen pictures of Kilimanjaro lately? How have ski resorts in the Alps been doing the last several years? Just look out in your garden some spring: last year, we had forsythia and japonica blooming *after* the azaleas. These people remind me of that old joke from the movies: "Who are you going to believe- me, or your own lying eyes."

Why are they jumping all over isolated cases of misconduct? If they were consistent, they'd have to reexamine some of their other positions in the same terms. But I suppose that would be asking for too much rationality...

Thanks,

Bill
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 12-06-2009, 12:14 PM
Roger Slater Roger Slater is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 16,476
Default

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...73a7WQBpWRY%3D
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 12-06-2009, 12:47 PM
David Anthony David Anthony is offline
Distinguished Guest Host
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Stoke Poges, Bucks, UK
Posts: 5,081
Default

It's interesting, but it's only one university, and not a particularly good one at that.
Since when did East Anglia get to lead the climate change campaign?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 12-06-2009, 12:54 PM
Ann Drysdale's Avatar
Ann Drysdale Ann Drysdale is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Old South Wales (UK)
Posts: 6,667
Default

To be fair, East Anglia, as a University, is especially acclaimed in one field - Creative Writing. Hmmmm....
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 12-06-2009, 03:32 PM
David Landrum's Avatar
David Landrum David Landrum is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Grand Rapdis, Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,421
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ann Drysdale View Post
To be fair, East Anglia, as a University, is especially acclaimed in one field - Creative Writing. Hmmmm....
It looks as if they really used their imaginations in this case.

dwl
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 12-06-2009, 05:04 PM
Roger Slater Roger Slater is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 16,476
Default

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/01/sc...ategate&st=cse

and

http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.co...ategate&st=cse

Last edited by Roger Slater; 12-06-2009 at 05:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Unread 12-06-2009, 05:31 PM
John Whitworth's Avatar
John Whitworth John Whitworth is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 12,945
Default

Here's an idiot's guide by a non-scientist.

1. Is the climate changing? Yes/No

2. If Yes then is it because of something we humans are doing? Yes/No

3. If Yes then can we reverse it? Yes/No

4. If Yes then should we reverse it? Yes/No

5. If Yes then what do we do?

1. Yes it does seem bloody wet round here. I'll give this a tentative yes.

2-5. I haven't the slightest idea. And don't tell me. I still won't have the slightest idea. I have to take it on trust.

6. Why should I trust you?

I'm Al Gore.Of course you can trust me.
You're a politician. I wouldn't trust you to tell me the time.

I'm a scientist. Of course you can trust me.
The why do you keep on LYING to me?

I'm not lying? Why should I lie?
For money. For career advancement. Because you are so certain you are right that you can't be bothered to try and convince fools like me. Scientists have behaved in this way in the past.

Scientists A,B,C,D,E...... all agree with me.
What about scientists Y and Z?
They are not real scientists.
How so?
Because if they were real scientists then they would agree with me.

That is as far as I have got with this one.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Unread 12-06-2009, 05:33 PM
Janet Kenny Janet Kenny is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Queensland, (was Sydney) Australia
Posts: 15,574
Default

None of us should dare express an opinion since none of us knows. Caution and respect should be the guidelines.

Let's not have a "did" didn't" argument. Let's all keep reading and watching, and voting.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



Forum Right Top
Forum Left Bottom Forum Right Bottom
 
Right Left
Member Login
Forgot password?
Forum LeftForum Right


Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 8,399
Total Threads: 21,840
Total Posts: 270,804
There are 1941 users
currently browsing forums.
Forum LeftForum Right


Forum Sponsor:
Donate & Support Able Muse / Eratosphere
Forum LeftForum Right
Right Right
Right Bottom Left Right Bottom Right

Hosted by ApplauZ Online