|
Notices |
It's been a while, Unregistered -- Welcome back to Eratosphere! |
|
|
06-10-2006, 12:11 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 9,656
|
|
I know there are at least some of us who write both formal and free verse, so I'll try this set of questions:
How do you decide whether a given idea is going to be set down in form or in free verse? Do you just start writing and see what comes out? Do you often change your mind and try drafts both ways?
And when you decide that a poem should be helped to find form (I think that's Golias's phrase) is there a process?
I'm eager to hear your ideas.
Maryann
|
06-10-2006, 12:53 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 856
|
|
Well, I'm extremely excited to be the very first to weigh in with It Depends, but let's see:
I think an awful lot about the idea "you know, I'm staring at an unreadable piece of flash fiction that really should have been a rock video," (or variations of that) when I'm reading. And when I'm writing, I fuss a lot over right fiction, right form. So generally, a lot of it has to do with what I'm after, and which format gives me the weapons to do what I want to do.
And that said, after I have an idea, yes, I do sit down with the deliberate intention to cough up a formal poem.
This works about a third of the time. I don't know whether this speaks to my abilities or the forms, but it's comforting to compare it to golf--the constraints are what makes it interesting, if you work through them once or twice to make it sing, you're hooked, and you don't always have a good round every time out. I'm just glad I'm caught by writing, and leave the golf to my friends.
When it comes to free verse, lately I've been writing a lot of narratives, so it often boils down to what needs to be prose and what is better served at the level of the line. So again, after I have what I think is a suitable idea, I do sit down deliberately to write free verse. And this works about half the time.
What about the duds? Most often they're just that. Occasionally, there's a conversion--I get a short story out of it, or a formal attempt becomes free verse, or (rarely) vice versa.
Fun question, and like you, I'm curious to hear how others go about it.
[This message has been edited by Ethan Anderson (edited June 10, 2006).]
|
06-10-2006, 06:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 893
|
|
I guess I don't really decide. I write in a very freeform sort of way. The first line goes down on the page and the rest of the poem depends on what that first line looks like. If it was in IP, the poem will be in IP, potentially rhymed. And then it's off to the races, so to speak.
I have lots of poems where I've written one version in free verse and another in IP. I have one poem that exists as free verse, IP, and an anapestic tetrameter sonnet.
I can generally sit down and write in whatever form I'd want to if there's a reason to. But that's generally not my preference.
Julie
|
06-10-2006, 10:18 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Fairfield, Ohio
Posts: 5,509
|
|
Maryann
I used to write strictly metrical, then began exploring the dark side, to concentrate strictly on other elements of a poem, save meter and end-rhyme.
Now, I generally write a draft in non-met, although it's usually very close to IP. At first I develop the idea without form, though generally a structure develops on it's own. It normally works itself into meter. Rhyme takes greater effort.
|
06-11-2006, 04:12 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Posts: 5,478
|
|
Maryann,
Despite the adage of "the poem decides," I believe (though every poem strikes me as a minor miracle) that I decide the form with a fair bit of malice of forethought. Sometimes I pick wrongly, which is where the poem begins to strenuously assert itself. But, probably like many people who work for a living, I tend not to immediately start writing a piece as soon as the idea comes to me. Rather, it goes in two stages. First, the idea--what the poem will be about, what mood I want it to strike and what formal devices will likely accomplish that and then, sometimes soon afterwards, sometimes considerably later, I start writing. By that point, I've typically thought enough about the potential piece to know what form I want it in, how long I want it to be, roughly, and so forth.
Quincy
|
06-11-2006, 07:51 PM
|
|
New Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Winter Springs, FL, USA
Posts: 4
|
|
Maryann,
I follow Robert Frost's advice.
|
06-11-2006, 07:55 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Posts: 5,478
|
|
Thomas,
Robert Frost gave funky buttloads of advice on writing poetry over the course of a particularly long life. To which advice do you refer?
Quincy
(A note on Frost--he was discovered by the great--GREAT!--free-verse poet Ezra Pound, which perhaps adds a wrinkle in this discussion. Or maybe not.)
|
06-11-2006, 08:48 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: California, USA
Posts: 1,285
|
|
Michael Donaghy: "The cyclist, not the cycle, steers."
In other words, what Quincy said. I quite like bullying my poems into submission. Uppity little SOBs.
--CS
|
06-12-2006, 04:25 AM
|
Distinguished Guest
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London
Posts: 2,128
|
|
Well, I'm pleased to say I'm with Clay and Quincy. Actually whay I usually do is carry an idea around for a while - like Quincy, I'm busy - then when something gels, or comes to me, or I get a minute, I start jotting. sometimes the jot turns into a draft, sometimes it's notes. But by the time I sit down to write it really is "the hand that moves the pen," and words just tumble out. Sometimes I may save only two words out of that, but what will have happened is that the thing will have asserted itself in some particular rhythm, or in an aural pattern, and it's a question of hearing that and shaping it.
but that's me. It's almost unheard of for me to write in a strict rhyme scheme - I don;t dislike poems that have them, I just think it isn't authentically my sound. You have to get to know, understand, and respect, your own style/ear/(dreaded word)voice.
Another thing is that I'll often sit down to write what I think is one poem, and end up dredging up all kinds of other stuff I had no idea I was going to write about. Very often what I think are three separate topics or ideas will all come together in one poem. And you're like: "Oh!"
I'll also point out that Pound, like all good free verse poets, had control of form.
It really is, as all the creative writing books tell you, a strange combination of intuitive writing - opening the mind in a particular way to receive the information - and that other process, of judging, manipulation, critical thinking.
We're artists, and I think it is important to remember that control of the medium is our task.
Of course if Clay and Quincy come on and disagree with me here I'm sunk.
KEB
|
06-12-2006, 04:44 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 572
|
|
"If poetry comes not as naturally as leaves to a tree, it had better not come at all." Keats
Well, I guess that's most of us screwed then.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member Login
Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 8,403
Total Threads: 21,892
Total Posts: 271,340
There are 3883 users
currently browsing forums.
Forum Sponsor:
|
|
|
|
|
|