|
Symposium Homepage
The Symposium
West Chester
Poetics
Formalism
Translation
Form and Narrative
Humor
Book Publication
Closing Thoughts
|
|
Panelist
|
Topic Discussions
|
|
Welcome the Able Muse Online Poetry Symposium featuring a roundtable
discussion on poetics and formalism by leading formalists.
The Panel members are:
R. S. Gwynn
Rachel Hadas
Mark Jarman
A. E. Stallings
Diane Thiel
And I (unobtrusively) moderate the discussions. Click on any of the above
links for the corresponding panelist's bio and featured poetry.
There is really no sequence to the symposium topics discussed here, and
readers may go through them in any order they choose. So, without
further ado, The Online Poetry Symposium!
Alex Pepple
|
Alex
Pepple |
1. Online publication and literature has its plusses and minuses, but it is
here to stay and getting more and more entrenched into our culture to such
an extent that most of our traditional paper journals now have some form of
online presence. How much has this medium affected your reading and
writing habits?
2. What is your impression of this online symposium, and where do you
see online publishing headed, for better or worse?
|
Mark
Jarman |
Online publication hasn't changed my writing habits, but I do now read a number of online
magazines, including The Cortland Review and The Atlantic Monthly's Audible
Anthology. And I edit a page myself, called
Poet of the Month, for PoetryNet. One thing we do not do at Poet of the Month is include recordings
of the poet reading his or her poems. This is the feature of many online publications which makes them ideal for
poetry.
|
Rachel
Hadas
|
I think of online publication as ancillary to, NOT a substitution for,
paper publication. The more media, the merrier; but I confess to not
reading online pubs as regularly as Mark Jarman does, and also to being nonplussed, if gratified, when I receive email queries about poems of mine
which students are studying and want help with. How do they find me?
Wouldn't they do better to read more widely rather than lazily going
straight to what they believe is the horse's mouth?
Still, online publication adds an ease and a new dimension.
|
A. E.
Stallings
|
I am excited about the possibilities for poetry online. Strangely, one of
the oldest arts turns out to be very compatible with one of the newest
technologieswhereas sculpture, painting, theatre, even the novel, really
are not.I do not think it will replace the printed pageand especially not the
book, which is an invention yet to be surpassed. Though I do wonder about
the future of printed periodicalsI think increasingly periodicals will
need a web presence to supplement their physical one.
Of course, in some ways it is easier to "publish" one's poems
on the web. So there is going to be a lot of drek out there. And it will
take time for certain sites to become widely recognized as having high
standards, as being "prestigious" in the way print publications
now are. Also, some poets may be uncomfortable with publishing in a medium
that appears so ephemeral. Web publishing is still in a highly
experimental stage, and it is hard to see where exactly it is headed. The
web may prove better in the end for re-printing, anthologizing, and disseminating
previously published work.
Indeed, ultimately I think web publications, to survive and thrive as
such, will have to offer something their print counterparts can'tsuch as
this virtual symposium. Poetry Daily is another good example. It is, as
Rachel says, ancillary to the printed word. It offers a daily poem
selected from print publications, so there is already a basic quality
filter involved. Yet it's "dailiness" is precisely something a
print publication would have difficulty reproducing.
On the other hand, I think it likely that, more and more, e-zines will
want to publish occasional print anthologies of their selections, to
partake of some of print's "permanence."
The web won't change the nature of poetry. But it may make it available
to a wider audience.
|
Diane
Thiel |
I
used to completely avoid the internet. Poetry Daily introduced me to the
webs possibilities last year. A poem of mine, Twelve-Day Buddhist
Silent Retreat, appeared in The Hudson Review, and though many people
read it there, when Poetry Daily selected it from the Hudson
Review, I had a
wealth of people contact me
old friends from college and grad school,
etc. And when Mark selected me for Poet of the Month last April, my brother convinced me to
set up a personal webpage as well
to have a place to post developments
and such and to link to various sites (publisher, etc.) I have found it
quite useful thus far and encourage others to do the same. Before 2000, I
hardly ever set fingers on the internet, (I'm a poet who still writes
everything by hand), but I am recognizing its possibilities. I certainly
agree with Rachel
that online publication will not be a substitute for
paper publication. I think readers of poetry, in particular, are usually
the type to enjoy the feel of a book in the hand. On the other hand, I
love the oral/aural possibilities that internet publication can provide.
|
R. S.
Gwynn |
I much prefer traditional methods of publication, but I can see the use of
online publication as well. At this stage, though, I think it should be
used to publicize work that's available in print elsewhere (as magazine
websites and archives do).
|
|
|
|