|
|
|

12-10-2011, 02:29 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 12,945
|
|
Dth1
1.
Preacher’s Grove
for John Stern
I carried an axe, a whetstone and two files,
not sheaves of poetry but drop-forged steels.
Sixteen, I could have tramped for fifty miles
if not for the blood pooling at my heels.
Mole foam was uninvented, and my boots
were brutal.All my scouts were little brutes,
scraping their knees while tripping over roots.
Recall an earlier day: at age eleven
I shouldered my enormous haversack,
some twenty pounds (the sleeping bag weighed seven.)
The bigger boys carried the heavier loads,
far more than any Tenderfoot could pack.
All of the paths we hiked were logging roads
to reach a campsite I recall as heaven.
It was a grove of virgin Norway pine.
Older, I’d hike alone there, afternoons
when I’d no map and compass course to line,
no Pioneering Merit Badge to teach,
only a switchback trail, a steep incline,
only the chorus of the distant loons—
and all the listeners I longed to reach.
|

12-10-2011, 02:48 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: usa
Posts: 7,687
|
|
I know this poem very well and love it - another heartbreaker. "All my scouts were little brutes" - just delicious.
|

12-10-2011, 03:40 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 14,175
|
|
I have a qualified guess. Good work as per ususal.
|

12-10-2011, 10:27 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Savannah, GA 31405
Posts: 4,055
|
|
Not many spherians are able to use the word "haversack." A fine piece.
|

12-11-2011, 04:48 AM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Middle England
Posts: 7,221
|
|
I don't remember seeing this one. I love the content, but can't help wondering why the rhyme scheme is different for each stanza. (Or is it a form I don't recognise?)
|

12-11-2011, 10:40 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 12,945
|
|
You have seen it, Jayne because you made that same remark. I don't know why the rhyme scheme is different.
|

12-11-2011, 11:30 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Iowa City, IA, USA
Posts: 10,440
|
|
I'll just say that I like that the rhyme scheme varies in each stanza. It allows for a greater element of surprise, gives the poet more flexibility, and yet maintains the same mix of rhymes: two of two, one of three.
Susan
|

12-11-2011, 11:41 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Old South Wales (UK)
Posts: 6,780
|
|
Whose woods these are, I think I know...
|

12-11-2011, 01:44 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada and Uruguay
Posts: 5,875
|
|
John,
When you posted this a few days ago on another thread I commented on it. My comment seems to have been deleted when you opened the new thread. It would be nice if you could retrieve the comment and repost it. Thanks.
Cathy
|

12-11-2011, 02:15 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Plum Island, MA; Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 11,203
|
|
It's a competent occasional poem, but doesn't push to get sufficiently beyond that. Not enough magic in this one for me. I'd love to see a rewrite. Get rid of the forced "bruits/roots" rhyme, eliminate the repeat of "recall" in S2, introduce more vivid language. Polish, polish, polish. Rewrite, rewrite. rewrite. My usual kvetch.
Last edited by Michael Cantor; 12-11-2011 at 02:24 PM.
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Member Login
Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 8,524
Total Threads: 22,724
Total Posts: 280,017
There are 3007 users
currently browsing forums.
Forum Sponsor:
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|