|
|
|

05-23-2013, 12:54 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 12,945
|
|
Speccie Show Time by 5th June
Pompous and prolix? Can that be us? Yes it can I am sure. I think examples can be found at leastv two hundred years ago. Are you as old as THAT, Bill?
No. 2801: SHOW TIME
You are invited to rewrite in pompous and prolix style any well-known simple poem (please specify; 16 lines max.). Email entries to lucy@spectator.co.uk by midday on 5 June.
Last edited by John Whitworth; 05-23-2013 at 12:58 AM.
Reason: Edit title
|

05-23-2013, 05:35 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London
Posts: 994
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Whitworth
Pompous and prolix? Can that be us? Yes it can I am sure. I think examples can be found at leastv two hundred years ago. Are you as old as THAT, Bill?
No. 2801: SHOW TIME
You are invited to rewrite in pompous and prolix style any well-known simple poem (please specify; 16 lines max.). Email entries to lucy@spectator.co.uk by midday on 5 June.
|
This has a distinctly Gavin Ewart-y feel to it. Looks like it could be fun.
|

05-23-2013, 05:52 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Ottawa, ON Canada
Posts: 608
|
|
I keep trying to read these things and it's all very British and goes over my little Canadian head (apparently I have many Britishisms to learn yet). Pompous I think I get, but prolix? Bloody google again.
Jeanne
|

05-23-2013, 05:54 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 5,502
|
|
I think perhaps 'prolix' could be translated as the writer's equivalent of 'blabbermouthed'.
|

05-23-2013, 06:01 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Ottawa, ON Canada
Posts: 608
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Allgar
I think perhaps 'prolix' could be translated as the writer's equivalent of 'blabbermouthed'.
|
Oh goodie, now that's my language (this latter part anyway), and my species! How can the clay say to the potter, why hast thou made me thus?
Jeanne
|

05-23-2013, 07:04 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 5,502
|
|
I do not like thee - why, I cannot say.
Is it thy breath, that reeks of rancid onions?
Is it thy feet, deformed by warts and bunions?
Thy nasal hair, exuberant and grey?
Thy scabby pate, thy brow grotesquely simian?
Thy lurching gait, thy swinish bloodshot eyes?
Thy buttocks, like a pair of flaccid pies?
Thou couldst not be mistaken for Endymion!
Thy raucous voice, thy sneering and thy snarling,
Thy violent tantrums, and thy vicious temper
Surpassing dogs with rabies or distemper -
In short, I’d find it hard to call thee “Darling”.
Perhaps, above all else, that fæcal smell
Is why I do not like thee, Doctor Fell.
Last edited by Brian Allgar; 05-24-2013 at 04:19 AM.
|

05-23-2013, 07:11 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 1,224
|
|
Heh heh heh -- this one is right up my street.
Fire and Ice
Although the future termination
Of planetary inhabitation
May come about through conflagration,
There's no definitive negation
Of the contrary situation:
Galloping global glaciation.
Metaphor extrapolation
Provides no further information.
Was:
Metaphorical simulation
Does not provide illumination.
Last edited by Mary McLean; 05-23-2013 at 01:28 PM.
Reason: tweaks
|

05-23-2013, 09:29 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Freedom, Maine
Posts: 1,313
|
|
The Was an Old Man From Nantucket
An elderly person of masculine gender
(A native-born son of the Isle of Nantucket),
Possessed a male organ so long, he could render
Its tip to his lips, and then zestfully suck it.
With laminar flow, the emerging ejaculate
Would drool from his mouth, and then pleasantly run
All the way to his jawbone; which then would initiate
A smile on his visage and feelings of fun.
Concurrent to wiping this dribbled ejaculate
From hair of his chin, he’d declare (with loquacity),
The sexual lust he could orally satiate
Would bolster the case for the likely veracity
Of boasting; "If somehow my ear was transformed
To a typical feminine vaginal cavity,
The coital act could be freely performed
With utmost decorum, and ponderous gravity."
Prolixity comes natural. Pomposity takes a little work.
Last edited by Douglas G. Brown; 05-24-2013 at 11:31 PM.
Reason: Several small fixes
|

05-23-2013, 09:53 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London
Posts: 994
|
|
The petals of flowering plants of the genus Rosa reflect light of the following spectral co-ordinates; wavelength 620-740 nm, frequency 480-400 THz,
The petals of flowering plants of the family Violaceae reflect light of the following spectral co-ordinates; wavelength 380-450 nm, frequency 800-715 THz,
Sucrose activates the G-protein gustducin which catalyzes the conversion of ATP to cAMP, leading to neurotransmitter release,
And so do you (metaphorically).
Last edited by Rob Stuart; 05-23-2013 at 03:35 PM.
|

05-23-2013, 10:23 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 1,224
|
|
Brilliant Rob, but I would like to pompously take issue with your scientific description: petals don't possess spectral coordinates, they reflect light of a given wavelength and frequency. I feel that your N would get this right.
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Member Login
Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 8,510
Total Threads: 22,645
Total Posts: 279,277
There are 6238 users
currently browsing forums.
Forum Sponsor:
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|