So much for banning inversions! Let's keep this article in mind as a reference when we need to demonstrate occasions when inverted syntax works very well indeed.
"The absence of punctuation and the consequent syntactical ambiguities are simultaneously disruptive and energising – the way collision and confusion often are."
"consequent syntactical ambiguities"... what a nice idea! Do we do enough of them? And, in practice, do readers always love them?