|
|

12-12-2013, 06:10 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Middle England
Posts: 7,199
|
|
The Oldie comp: Definitions by 10th January
I can't say I remember this type of thing in The Oldie comp before. Some of The Washington Post-ers are good at this kind of thing (Roger, for instance!) and it does look like fun, so the best of luck with it.
Jayne
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxThe Oldie Competitionxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxby Tessa Castro
COMPETITION NO 172
In 2013 there was much unseemly interest in the new word ‘twerk’. Without limiting yourself to low meanings, please provide a snappy new definition and a sentence exemplifying the new meaning for each of these words: booly, jaunce, tytyfer, maumy, pronk, looper, raffinose, hendship. Maximum 160 words.
Entries to ‘Competition No 172’ by post (The Oldie, 65 Newman Street, London W1T 3EG), fax (020 7436 8804) or email (comps@theoldie.co.uk) by 10 January 2014.
|

12-13-2013, 12:52 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Old South Wales (UK)
Posts: 6,780
|
|
Uxbridge English Dictionary!
|

12-13-2013, 06:17 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 5,502
|
|
[groan ...]
|

12-14-2013, 12:49 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: lancashire
Posts: 1,121
|
|
Is 'raffi nose' intended to be 2 words? 'Raffinose' exists.
|

12-14-2013, 02:37 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Old South Wales (UK)
Posts: 6,780
|
|
Well. I suppose
A raffi nose
Is what you smell your farts with;
A mention of sprouts
To quell our doubts
Is the kick that Christmas starts with.
(Bah! Humbug...)
|

12-14-2013, 02:38 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 12,945
|
|
I think two words, Bazza. A lot of the words exist, but I suppose they want something different.
|

12-14-2013, 06:17 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: lancashire
Posts: 1,121
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Whitworth
I think two words, Bazza. A lot of the words exist, but I suppose they want something different.
|
As they specify a snappy NEW definition, i.e a subjective, fanciful one that will have everyone pissing themselves with laughter as opposed to the mundane literal one to be found in the dico, all the words should exist. But why, uniquely, include a two-word phrase that semantically limits compers (already unfairly limited by some warning hint about eschewing the filth that makes this whole damn comping chore worthwhile)?
Incidentally, I did piss myself laughing at Ann's intervention. Auden writes somewhere that we all enjoy the sight of our own handwriting as we do the smell of our own farts. Not true. I hate longhand.
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Member Login
Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 8,510
Total Threads: 22,631
Total Posts: 279,161
There are 1512 users
currently browsing forums.
Forum Sponsor:
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|