Eratosphere Forums - Metrical Poetry, Free Verse, Fiction, Art, Critique, Discussions Able Muse - a review of poetry, prose and art

Forum Left Top

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Unread 03-03-2005, 02:25 AM
Tim Love's Avatar
Tim Love Tim Love is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 2,586
Blog Entries: 1
Post

The Next Generation poetry event happened in the UK last year. Fortunately Poetry is news that stays news. Thanks to my local public library I've recently had a chance to read about half of the 20 poets chosen to lead UK poetry into the future. I knew it was a PR drive. What I hadn't realised is quite how much of a publisher-driven stunt it was. See http://www.poetrybookshoponline.com/next_generation.asp
for details.

In any anthology or selection of this type there are bound to be items whose inclusion seems inexplicable. About 20% fall into that category for me. Maz, Margaret Moore etc seem more interesting and youthful than several of these NextGen poets.

Each poet has a narrow range, and the majority of the poets seem to have gone to the same workshop. The stylistic range is from anecdotal to mute-martian, written in broken prose. Exceptions are Hannah (who rhymes), Oswald (who's non-mainstream) and Agbabi (who's non-WASP). Tokenism?

There's seeming censorship against the academic and the abstract, which might in turn account for the limited range of genres. The diction's educated but rarely intellectual. It's strange that though the poets "explore issues" like Race, Beauty, etc, they shy away from any connection with experts in Sociology, Aesthetics, etc, prefering to present an incident at a bus-stop or overheard conversation at the Tate Museum's canteen. You might object that poetry's not supposed to be sociology. I'd reply by saying that there's no reason why poetry shouldn't call upon the expertise of those in other fields. By not doing so it risks marginalising itself even more. I think the rule of thumb should be to show what can be shown, and tell the rest, rather than restrict oneself to writing only about what can be shown. Poetry's not Pictionary.

You may have heard that we in the UK are still relaxed about Form. Maybe, but judging from this selection, Form's on its last legs. For many of the poets Form means leaving every third line blank. When poets lapse into meter it seems rather clumsy to me. For example, I find this couplet a misjudged, Nashy mouthful

while an old dandelion unpicks her shawl
and one by one the small spent oak flowers fall
and I don't know why the following has been lamed.

and row as far as Totnes
and there get out and stand,
outcasts of the earth, kings
of the green island England.

Imagery is in general disappointing. One poet describes chestnuts as "Miniature mines"! Lack of ambition abounds. As the publicity blurb says of one collection, these are "poems that remind us why memory is such an important human faculty". Too true.

So please don't judge us Brits by these poets. I wish I could excuse them by virtue of their youth, but there was no upper age limit - I'm younger than some of these flagbearers.

Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



Forum Right Top
Forum Left Bottom Forum Right Bottom
 
Right Left
Member Login
Forgot password?
Forum LeftForum Right


Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 8,525
Total Threads: 22,732
Total Posts: 280,068
There are 1703 users
currently browsing forums.
Forum LeftForum Right


Forum Sponsor:
Donate & Support Able Muse / Eratosphere
Forum LeftForum Right
Right Right
Right Bottom Left Right Bottom Right

Hosted by ApplauZ Online