|
|

11-14-2010, 06:33 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,717
|
|
Thanks for being here, Katy!
And thanks for the additional links, Maryann! That last one was very funny! I knew nothing of him before today, but I'm learning a little, link by link. I only wish I had access to more of his poems!
|

11-15-2010, 01:50 AM
|
Distinguished Guest
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London
Posts: 2,128
|
|
Hi Cally. Well, the Collecteds seem to be out of print but you can still get the individual books: Shibboleth, Errata, Conjure and Safest. Start with any of them. From the US your best bet might be ABEbooks, but have a look round...
I looked at your links Maryann, and I've seen that interview before - nice to see it still on there! I clicked at random and heard Michael talking about the way poery and dance are two [rehistoric art forms, and both created to enable memory - that is, to enable information to be stored within them, to be transmitted, as he says, from person to person - or even generation to generation. This is a central tenet of his work and gets to the heart of itvery quickly - the fact that what we're doing when we write a poem - or read a poem - is taking part in something hardwired into being human. And the connection between poetry and dance: there's a poem, and a Selected volume, called "Remembering the Steps to Dances Learned Last Night." In his monograph Wallflowers, which is absolutely fascinating from start to finish and once again contains most of his essential ideas about what poetry is - he describes the pattern he imagines might be left on the floor, tracing the movements of dancers' feet, as the equivalent of a written record of the dance - the way written poetry is the record of the poetry in real time. We were doing both long before we could write.
He was fascinated by mnemonics, the tools that were developed to aid memory. The Renaissance Memory Palaces were enormous constructs where each "room" in the palace would be accessed - along with its information - according to where it was situated, both on its own and in relation to other "rooms."
This reminds me of a book I wanted to read, maybe it's out now and I should look. A few years ago the Royal Shakespeare Company performed the entirety of Shakespeare's history plays, using one company over two or three years. A staggering feat for them - memorising all these plays. I read it in the Sunday papers, I think, an interview with the director about how they went about memorising, & I'm sure there was going to be a book... Of course, actors learn lines, but they don't JUST learn lines. I was talking to one of them about this, because I knew a couple of people in the cast. He said it was very holistic. They learned the lines, sure, but the tools they used were blocking, cues, the words and sounds that go with a certain movement - they learn the dance of it, in other words, and they learn it physically as much as intellectually. Michael would have loved that.
It's important to remember - and I very much think this, and I think it's partly how you develop your ear, and Michael used to talk about it - that words are physical. Your speech affects your breathing, which affects your oxygen levels, slows or speeds up your body - words produce sound waves that go through your head, waves are physical. He pointed out - maybe in Wallflowers - that even if you just you move your lips silently to yourself as you read, tests have shown that your brain registers it as real speech. I'll look for the quote.
|

11-15-2010, 01:55 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,717
|
|
Katy - I have nothing to say, except please - keep talking! Silence does not mean not listening, not breathing hard at all you are telling.
Just, rave on, ok? What you're saying is great!
All ears, all eyes,
Cally
p.s. I saw a documentary about that! On the teacher who worked with them, learning the plays by moving. I remember them giving speeches while having to do certain movements, or the rest of the cast pulling at them - all sorts of physical ways of getting to the words. It was GREAT!!
Last edited by Cally Conan-Davies; 11-15-2010 at 02:10 AM.
|

11-15-2010, 02:16 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,717
|
|
Am I allowed to post this? Take it down, if not - I'm ignorant of such things. But ohh ...
The River in Spate
sweeps us both down its cold grey current.
Grey now as your father was when I met you,
I wake even now on that shore where once,
sweat slick and still, we breathed together--
in--soft rain gentling the level of the lake,
out--bright mist rising from the lake at dawn.
How long before we gave each other to sleep,
to air--drawing the mist up, exhaling the rain?
Though we fight now for breath and weaken
in the torrent's surge to the dark of its mouth,
you are still asleep in my arms by its source,
small waves lapping the gravel shore,
and I am still awake and watching you,
in wonder, without sadness, like a child.
|

11-15-2010, 03:24 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lazio, Italy
Posts: 5,814
|
|
Wonderful poem, Cally! I like Donaghy's poetry so much, and though I've seen a number of his pieces, I'm abashed I don't know it better. I look forward to giving some time to it this week. Thank you for starting this thread, Katy.
Here's one that I have in an old Hudson Review, Winter 2000 issue. I have no idea what collection it would be in.
Refusals
Shooting their horses and setting their houses alight,
The faithful struck out for a hillside in Sussex
To wait for the prophesied rapture to take them
At midnight, New Year's Eve, 1894.
But they knelt in the slow drifting snow singing hymns,
Hushing their children and watching the stars,
Until the sky brightened and the cold sun rose white
Over the plain where their houses still smouldered.
Some froze there all day, some straggled back sobbing
To salvage what little remained of their lives,
Others went mad and refused, 'til the end of their days
To believe that the world was still there.
Here, ten seconds to midnight, they join in the count
Over tin horns squealing in the bright drunk rooms.
|

11-15-2010, 07:50 AM
|
Lariat Emeritus
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fargo ND, USA
Posts: 13,816
|
|
Although Michael and I wrote from different worlds, mine entirely rural and his urban, we saw eye to eye on memory. The only other poets I know who really recite an entire program are Dana Gioia and Kay Ryan, and they keep a book in front of them and "pretend" to look at it. I just carry a notecard with the list of poems, and Mikey didn't even do that.
One of the few times I read with another poet, very well known, a little girl asked her mother in my hearing "Mommy, why was that lady reading from a book?" From the mouths of babes... I think one reason Mikey wanted me to recite to his students in London was so they would know he wasn't a freak of nature. As I wrote in the adjacent thread:
"She watched you springing for the microphone
to read without a text,
master of pacing, phrasing, pitch and tone.
Pity the poor bastard who went next,
yet even he is grieving
your prematurely leaving
a stage so few could ever wholly own."
|

11-15-2010, 08:12 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Stocksbridge. Near the Dark Peak.
Posts: 1,524
|
|
Reading Shibboleth.
Poems like this one make me think I should learn dance and meter. From Shibboleth OUP 1988.
Khalypso.
Cast off old love like substance from a flame;
Cast off that ballast from your memory.
But leave me and you leave behind your name.
When snows have made ideas of the rain,
When canvas bloats and ships grow on the sea,
Cast off old love like substance from a flame.
Your eyes are green with oceans and you strain
To crown and claim your sovereignty,
You leave me and you leave behind your name
And all the mysteries these isles retain.
But if the god of sailors hacks you free,
Cast off old love like substance from a flame
Until you’re in a woman’s bed again
And make her moan as you make me,
‘Leave me and you leave behind your name.’
The brails go taut. The halyard jerks, the pain
Of breeching to the squall and all to be
Cast off, old love, like substance from a flame.
Now leave me. I will live behind your name.
|

11-15-2010, 08:20 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lazio, Italy
Posts: 5,814
|
|
I just bought used copies of Conjure and Safest from Abebooks U.K. for just over $20 for the two of them. The Collected Poems was out of my price range--about 60 bucks. There's a volume that puts together his first two collections, and it doesn't cost that much, but I don't know what the earlier collections might be like compared to the later ones. I already know I really really like at least some of the poems in Conjure
Katy or Tim or someone: how does the early Donaghy compare to the later work? Did it change a lot, get better, get worse, or . . .
|
 |
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Member Login
Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 8,506
Total Threads: 22,612
Total Posts: 278,907
There are 3815 users
currently browsing forums.
Forum Sponsor:
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|