|
|

10-13-2015, 09:21 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Inside the Beltway
Posts: 4,057
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maryann Corbett
I can't remember even one.
|
Exactly. We remember, fondly, good times, and our memories fail us. After a while we talk ourselves into believing our good memories.
And we forget the bad ones. As with broken bones, months or years later. We don't recall the sharp pain, the feeling of vulnerability. We just have a vague memory of it being difficult. I remember I couldn't pick up the christmas tree with my broken arm, but I don't remember the exact feeling that made me curse when I tried.
Best,
Bill
|

10-13-2015, 10:06 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Halcott, New York
Posts: 10,012
|
|
Enough with the royal "we", Bill.
I am not being mistily nostalgic. I remember clearly.
Nemo
|

10-13-2015, 11:32 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 8,708
|
|
I've noticed a LOT more announcements about good poets dying than about good poets being born.
|

10-13-2015, 12:24 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Plum Island, MA; Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 11,203
|
|
What Nemo said, Bill. It was a time when, not only did we attract outstanding poets, but we actually worked our poetry - we didn't brag about getting bored with it the minute the first draft it was finished, and giving it to our wife to polish and submit. And we didn't think there was anything wrong in telling people we didn't like their poem - as a matter of fact, that's why most of us were at the Sphere - for tough feedback and improvement. It isn't just nostalgia - it was a more demanding environment.
|

10-13-2015, 12:43 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 16,746
|
|
My real problem with Bill's comment isn't the royal we, which is only slightly annoying, but the fact that it seems to have nothing to do with the Maryann's comment that he quotes and purports to be responding to. All Maryann said was that she can't recall any poem that Alicia posted here for critique. To which Bill mysteriously says, "After a while we talk ourselves into believing our good memories." Huh?
|

10-13-2015, 01:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 8,708
|
|
I looked up "Aftershocks," which was in the 2003 Sonnet Bake-off (not workshopped).
And lo and behold, in the thread announcing it as one of the winners, several people took the opportunity to lament that the response had fallen off significantly from the previous year's Bake-off.
Even in the Golden Age, people were longing for how much better things used to be. (Not that they didn't make good points.)
It seems more productive to focus on making the most out of the present realities. One such reality is that I seem to be getting grumpier (which is sometimes unhelpful and unwelcoming and I'll try to keep that under control better than I did in a recent critique); but I think that my grumpiness has positive qualities, too. I'm more likely now than in 2003 to say I don't like something, and I doubt that my previous silence helped many people to become better poets.
Last edited by Julie Steiner; 10-13-2015 at 01:07 PM.
|

10-13-2015, 01:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: England, UK
Posts: 5,408
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Slater
My real problem with Bill's comment isn't the royal we, which is only slightly annoying, but the fact that it seems to have nothing to do with the Maryann's comment that he quotes and purports to be responding to. All Maryann said was that she can't recall any poem that Alicia posted here for critique. To which Bill mysteriously says, "After a while we talk ourselves into believing our good memories." Huh?
|
Roger,
Maryann was responding to Michael's comment that A.E. Stallings "almost certainly" posted her own poems for critique, and in that context, Bill is making the point that we tend to inflate our memories of the good old days. Or that's how I read it. It made sense to me.
best,
Matt
|

10-13-2015, 02:06 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Takoma Park, MD
Posts: 3,706
|
|
Indeed, Alicia Stallings did post many poems back in the day -- it's just that we hardly noticed since we were busy stuffing the golden apples of youth in our knapsacks as we rode through the abundant orchards on dinosaurs; all of it, all of it made possible by the fact that we were incredibly, gloriously cranky.
Best,
Ed
|

10-13-2015, 02:27 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lazio, Italy
Posts: 5,814
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Q
Roger,
Maryann was responding to Michael's comment that A.E. Stallings "almost certainly" posted her own poems for critique, and in that context, Bill is making the point that we tend to inflate our memories of the good old days. Or that's how I read it. It made sense to me.
best,
Matt
|
Well then, I really don't get what Bill said. I thought it had something to do with being like Hesiod and Ovid, back in the golden days when they were Sphereans.
|
 |
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Member Login
Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 8,524
Total Threads: 22,723
Total Posts: 279,988
There are 2049 users
currently browsing forums.
Forum Sponsor:
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|