|
|
|

10-11-2013, 03:20 AM
|
 |
Distinguished Guest
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: United States
Posts: 2,468
|
|
Translation Bakeoff Finalist: Goes
Steps
Your first step will be small, my child,
your last step, small as well.
With the first, you'll hold my hand,
the last, you'll take yourself.
Soon you will walk many steps,
and wander from my sight.
Who knows what kind of steps you'll take
through daylight, through the night?
Walk a bold step, take a brave step.
The world is great and yours.
After the last step we will be
together, child, once more.
Die Schritte
Klein ist, mein Kind, dein erster Schritt,
Klein wird dein letzter sein.
Den ersten gehn Vater und Mutter mit,
Den letzten gehst du allein.
Seis um ein Jahr, dann gehst du, Kind,
Viel Schritte unbewacht,
Wer weiß, was das dann für Schritte sind
Im Licht und in der Nacht?
Geh kühnen Schritt, tu tapfren Tritt,
Groß ist die Welt und dein.
Wir werden, mein Kind, nach dem letzten Schritt
Wieder beisammen sein.
– Albrecht Goes
Literal:
The Steps
Your first step, my child, is small,
your last will be small.
The first you'll walk with Father and Mother,
the last you'll walk alone.
After a year, then you'll walk, child,
many steps, unguarded,
who knows what kind of steps they'll then be,
in the light and in the night?
Walk a bold step, take a brave step,
the world is great and yours.
We will, my child, after the last step,
be together again.
Last edited by Jennifer Reeser; 10-11-2013 at 03:43 AM.
Reason: indexing fix
|

10-11-2013, 03:37 AM
|
 |
Distinguished Guest
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: United States
Posts: 2,468
|
|
Judge's comments
This poem is fully realized, in sound, form and content. It needs no suggestions from me. Simple, innocent and effective. Instinctively, it knows that “Father and Mother” is not essential to the poem, because of the address in line 1, “my child.”
“..from my sight” is not exactly to fit, but brings across some feeling. Here is a prime example of a translator who makes “sing-song” translation look effortless – something it most definitely is not. Well done, Sieben.
DG
|

10-11-2013, 04:04 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Iowa City, IA, USA
Posts: 10,407
|
|
I think this successfully captures the simplicity and serenity of the original, while including enough variations to avoid monotony.
Susan
|

10-11-2013, 07:44 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: oy of the storm
Posts: 5,002
|
|
I'm very taken with this translation, but 'my' child, for me, eclipses the Vater und Mitter specific. In this day and age with so much single parenting, "my" carries very different connotations and speaks of the absent rather than a dual present. Perhaps it's nonetheless possible to get Mother and Father in, or at the least use "our". But other than that, lovely work.
|

10-11-2013, 10:44 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 743
|
|
A good solid version here, and not a slave to rhyme, but, as has been mentioned, Vater und Mutter should have been retained. I can almost see this as a song sung to a child, with a bit of lyrical tweaking. In all, fine work nevertheless.
Last edited by Skip Dewahl; 10-11-2013 at 10:46 PM.
|

10-12-2013, 08:33 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,177
|
|
I'm with Seree and Skip: the exclusion of Father and Mother alters the tone of the piece, particularly with the use of the unsupported "my," S2/L2.
Given the departure from a serious attempt at rhyme, I don't think the vague slant justifies "yourself" for the original "alone," S1/L4. The translator might also consider "in daylight and at night" for S2/L4, which would be truer to the original.
Sweet, musical, a fine effort.
|

10-12-2013, 08:54 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Old South Wales (UK)
Posts: 6,780
|
|
"My child" came across to me as no more than a simple mode of address. There is one person speaking, on behalf of both parents. So using "our hands" and "our sight" would make no difference to rhyme or scansion and restore the picture of the family relationship without spoiling the pleasing simplicity of the poem.
I speak only of the poem in English, having no German.
|

10-12-2013, 09:06 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 5,501
|
|
Given that the original is a simple poem that uses perfect rhymes throughout, I found the combination of slant/perfect/no rhymes disappointing. It gets off to a particularly bad start with
xxYour first step will be small, my child,
xxyour last step, small as well.
xxWith the first, you'll hold my hand,
xxthe last, you'll take yourself.
where lines 1 and 3 don't even pretend to rhyme, and lines 2 and 4 are what some might call a 'slant' rhyme, but I see as a failed attempt at rhyming.
Overall, it's not bad, but this aspect spoils it for me completely.
|

10-12-2013, 10:34 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Scio, Ohio
Posts: 540
|
|
I agree with Ann--simply changing to "our steps" and "our sight" I think makes the poem stronger plus retains the sense of the original
|

10-12-2013, 03:46 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Savannah, GA 31405
Posts: 4,055
|
|
I'm afraid I'm with Brian. The off rhymes in this type of poem are harmful. Simplicity and truthfulness-these come in part through the simple accentual rhyming of the German.
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Member Login
Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 8,507
Total Threads: 22,620
Total Posts: 279,007
There are 2745 users
currently browsing forums.
Forum Sponsor:
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|