Hi Janice, well the YouTube is good - it's polemical but at least it attempts to use facts to redress the balance. It's slick, but then, it has to be slick to convince its target audience, the doubters. But it doesn't originate on this blog. She's just pasted it in.
Did you read the rest of this blog?
Bold, italics, underlines, different-coloured fonts, witch-hunts, unreadably dense text - they all tell you something... The top few posts include three pictures of people ranting - mouths open and fingers pointing - an open accusation of fraud, and a hysterical blather about something or other over at Ms Magazine.
Even in the post you linked, Janice, the word "despicable" in the headline is a little giveaway! Not exactly impartial, is she? For all her flag-waving "FactCheck.org" logo at the top, she's more into ranting - and, at least in terms of UK law, libellous remarks.
Not much more into the facts than McCain is, then!
As to the video, it was easy to get more information about it it, to decide whether to believe it or not. I Googled Robert Greenwald, who made it.
Here he
is . Then, because it says "BraveNew PAC," I Googled bravenew.
Here they are.
I think they're a lot more reliable than the blog they've been pasted into.
[This message has been edited by Katy Evans-Bush (edited September 14, 2008).]
Threaded Mode
