[A. E. Stallings]

I think Susan was the one to point out to me the deadpan humor in Gluck. It certainly helps to read some of them that way! Kudos...

[Janice D. Soderling]

Gratitude by Louise G. is a good example of that deadpan humor.

http://www.wisdomportal.com/Gratitud...Gratitude.html

Black humor, bitter amusement.

Better than a belly laugh sometimes.

[Terese Coe]

Congratulations, Sam!

[Roger Slater]

Janice, there's a difference between "funny" and ironic or "funny" and simply using some of the common techniques or ingredients found in funny poems. Most sugar cookie recipes list salt among their ingredients, but that doesn't mean we would say sugar cookies are a "salty" food. I like that Gluck poem, but it's certainly not funny. Why can't we reserve "funny" for things that tend to make us laugh? Gluck doesn't.

[Kate Benedict]

Yeah, irony can be rather ... heavy sometimes. "Seriously Funny" has been a category in Bumbershoot for a couple of years and for it I look for more in the way of actual laughter, however warped or wry. I'm a bit miffed at the seeming "theft" of my title ... then again, who could own such a thing? It's been in the zeitgeist.

[Andrew Frisardi]

(Deleted a not-funny attempt to be funny.)

[Roger Slater]

Kate, defintely zeitgeisty. The exact phrase "seriously funny" appears 10,000 times in a Google search that is limited to the year 2005. I didn't go back further than that.

PS--
I went back. It appears just 1,700 times in 2004, which means either that the zeitgeist gained steam in 2005, or the number of internet pages (at least those searched by Google) jacked up during that period.