|
|
|

04-12-2017, 06:42 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 16,720
|
|
I've noticed that the majority of words people have chosen cannot be easily rhymed. And no one has gone with a one-syllable word. Make of that what you will.
|

04-12-2017, 07:04 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Saeby, Denmark
Posts: 3,241
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Slater
And no one has gone with a one-syllable word.
|
I chose several.
Duncan
|

04-12-2017, 07:09 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Freedom, Maine
Posts: 1,313
|
|
Uniformitarianism
Diatomaceous
Platypus
|

04-12-2017, 07:24 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: TX
Posts: 6,630
|
|
Many of our lexical choices are indeed both erudite and recondite. I could expatiate further, as I am wont, but I digress. The nub - the crux - of my argument is an old one: brief words have weight.
|

04-12-2017, 07:52 AM
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,219
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Isbell
Many of our lexical choices are indeed both erudite and recondite. I could expatiate further, as I am wont, but I digress. The nub - the crux - of my argument is an old one: brief words have weight.
|
He's not a formalist, but Larry Levis' "Elegy With an Angel at its Gate" leans heavily on the importance of "its" -- in the title, to be sure, but also throughout. Such an insignificant word, yet so weighty in that long poem.
There are many other examples, of course, but that one springs to mind.
|

04-12-2017, 11:40 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sioux City, IA
Posts: 905
|
|
Velleity
my favorite didactylic: minimifidian
my favorite diamphibrachic: uxoriophilic ["being in love with being in love with one's wife," a rather apt description of Petruchio?]
|

04-12-2017, 05:45 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Middle England
Posts: 7,188
|
|
Skanky - it's not a pleasant way to describe someone or something, but I love it all the same, and use it a lot!
Magical
Dodecahedron
Jayne
|

04-12-2017, 05:58 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 4,634
|
|
Skanky! That's great, Jayne. I also love the noun "skank": she's a skank!
Do you know "skink" as well? Here's a link to a skink: https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl...Ls1oW4CA#spf=1
I could provide a link to a skank as well, if you wish.
A kink for skanks? No thanks!
__________________
Aaron Poochigian
Last edited by Aaron Poochigian; 04-12-2017 at 06:04 PM.
|

04-12-2017, 06:26 PM
|
New Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Troy, Alabama USA
Posts: 69
|
|
chthonic
Theotokos
steatopygia
okra
siguiryas
|

04-12-2017, 06:37 PM
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,219
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayne Osborn
Skanky - it's not a pleasant way to describe someone or something, but I love it all the same, and use it a lot!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron Poochigian
Skanky! That's great, Jayne. I also love the noun "skank": she's a skank!
|
Ahh! Good one, Jayne...and it reminds me of it's "Sk" counterpart, "Sketchy," which I also love (and use far more often than I should).
And as per John's post, I was thinking of another short word that I adore -- "peep." It comes up in Shakespeare all the time, and I love it -- peeping out between Caesar's legs, for instance. It's so innocuous, and a strangely "cute" word, yet Shakespeare in particular often uses it in highly charged contexts.
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Member Login
Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 8,502
Total Threads: 22,597
Total Posts: 278,781
There are 1919 users
currently browsing forums.
Forum Sponsor:
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|